Fishing ban?

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
15,169
City & State/Province
Texas
It looks like Macon can take "Fishing" out of the title of this thread now.

If you aint heard, you might want to google about the fishing ban.
 
backhoeboogie":1stvnkmc said:
It looks like Macon can take "Fishing" out of the title of this thread now.

If you aint heard, you might want to google about the fishing ban.

He]] I haven't been able to catch OR eat one since they changed their name to "Sea Kittens". :lol2:
 
mattyboy":vyslfoj5 said:
You've got to be kidding me

There's a whole lot of folks wishing it was a joke.

It aint happening.

Seems a whole lot of left is shifting right on this one.
 
Boogie...found this also:

But PETA has a lesser-known claim to fame that has critics fuming: The organization euthanizes over 90 percent of the dogs and cats relinquished to its headquarters in Norfolk, Va. In 2009, PETA euthanized 2,301 dogs and cats -- 97 percent of those brought in -- and adopted only eight, according to Virginia state figures. And the rate of these killings has been increasing. From 2004 to 2008, euthanasia at PETA increased by 10 percent.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is coming under fire for euthanizing more than 90 percent of the dogs and cats relinquished to its Norfolk, Va., headquarters. Here, a PETA activist acts out a lesson on animal birth control in New Delhi last year.

The numbers are remarkable in contrast to nearby shelters. In the same town, the Norfolk City Pound euthanized 54.7 percent of its dogs and cats in 2009. In 2008, the most recent year on record, the Norfolk SPCA found homes for 86 percent of its dogs and cats and euthanized only 5.3 percent.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top