Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Eric Garner Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greybeard" data-source="post: 1198735" data-attributes="member: 18945"><p>If I had a problem with it, I would have said so. I had a problem with the part I emphasized (underlined). </p><p>Inasmuch as I am a stalwart believer in the 1st amendment, you should already know I would not try to deprive you of your constitutional rights to post whatever you little heart desires, even if it is a fallacy. That does not mean, that I won't point out the fallacy of your underlined sensationalistic statement. </p><p>(I don't have to google how a grand jury works, I've sat on one too.)</p><p>Again, and I realize you have difficulty with this, but the grand jury did NOT say "NO!!!!" to a charge of 'breach of protocol, or a civil rights violation, nor did it say "NO!!!!" to whether the debate should be about those 2 issues. </p><p></p><p>As far as the personal phone conversation between you and the current lame duck president, that's none of my business. If I wanted to know, I'd ask the NSA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greybeard, post: 1198735, member: 18945"] If I had a problem with it, I would have said so. I had a problem with the part I emphasized (underlined). Inasmuch as I am a stalwart believer in the 1st amendment, you should already know I would not try to deprive you of your constitutional rights to post whatever you little heart desires, even if it is a fallacy. That does not mean, that I won't point out the fallacy of your underlined sensationalistic statement. (I don't have to google how a grand jury works, I've sat on one too.) Again, and I realize you have difficulty with this, but the grand jury did NOT say "NO!!!!" to a charge of 'breach of protocol, or a civil rights violation, nor did it say "NO!!!!" to whether the debate should be about those 2 issues. As far as the personal phone conversation between you and the current lame duck president, that's none of my business. If I wanted to know, I'd ask the NSA. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Eric Garner Case
Top