Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Elk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J Hoy" data-source="post: 1833618" data-attributes="member: 16398"><p>I just said that there should be a total ban on the three most used top teratogenic pesticides that are reported to be causing drastic declines in invertebrates and vertebrates, all of which humans need for their survival. Those three, imidacloprid, glyphosate and chlorothalonil, are also causing serious health effects on livestock. You are very correct, we desperately need world wide population control, preferably not by nuking everybody and not by starving everyone either. I never once said that there should be a total ban on all pesticides.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We obviously don't need DNA proof that the birth defects and mortality wasn't genetics. I have said numerous times that each spring from 1995, the year after imidacloprid began being used to present, that individuals of many species of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians began being observed with underbite or overbite and/or the other definitive birth defects that began in 1995. We certainly don't need to do DNA testing on hundreds of species to prove those birth defects are not caused by genetics in all those species of several groups of vertebrates. Any scientist will tell you that and likely most 5th graders could too. If you care what those three top teratogenic pesticides are doing to your livestock and children as well as many species of wildlife, as you say you do, then livestock owners must be asking government officials, and especially the EPA to ban those three teratogenic pesticides - right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J Hoy, post: 1833618, member: 16398"] I just said that there should be a total ban on the three most used top teratogenic pesticides that are reported to be causing drastic declines in invertebrates and vertebrates, all of which humans need for their survival. Those three, imidacloprid, glyphosate and chlorothalonil, are also causing serious health effects on livestock. You are very correct, we desperately need world wide population control, preferably not by nuking everybody and not by starving everyone either. I never once said that there should be a total ban on all pesticides. We obviously don't need DNA proof that the birth defects and mortality wasn't genetics. I have said numerous times that each spring from 1995, the year after imidacloprid began being used to present, that individuals of many species of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians began being observed with underbite or overbite and/or the other definitive birth defects that began in 1995. We certainly don't need to do DNA testing on hundreds of species to prove those birth defects are not caused by genetics in all those species of several groups of vertebrates. Any scientist will tell you that and likely most 5th graders could too. If you care what those three top teratogenic pesticides are doing to your livestock and children as well as many species of wildlife, as you say you do, then livestock owners must be asking government officials, and especially the EPA to ban those three teratogenic pesticides - right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Elk
Top