Nesikep
Well-known member
I'm trying to remember my Biology 101 from darned near 18 years ago, and my memory is a little shaky about it... so perhaps Milkmaid, or one of the vets can confirm what I'm remembering..
We always say that a calf gets half it's DNA from each side of it's family, and yes, that is true, but not exactly half of it's genetic makeup... Here's why, according to what I remember
The mitochondria, a small structure in a cell (an organelle), are the energy producers in a cell, and have genetic material of their own, it is a like DNA of it's own. This genetic material is ONLY inherited from the mother (the egg) and not from the sire or sperm.
The reason I remember this is that apparently there was some murder case where a strand of the suspects hair was found, and the only genetic material on it was from mitochondria, and no cell DNA, so since it could have been anyone on the mothers side of the family, it wasn't enough to convict them.
Now I'm thinking of how this could affect breeding.. After all, the mitochondria is the energy supplier of the cell, and perhaps why some cow families are great producers through generations, even when the percentage of DNA of the original cow is getting pretty darned small, the mitochondrial genes are still unchanged. This would of course be especially evident in feed efficiency and milk production, but not calving ease and physical appearance.
Does this sound right to anyone? Can anyone correct me on errors or forgetfulness?
We always say that a calf gets half it's DNA from each side of it's family, and yes, that is true, but not exactly half of it's genetic makeup... Here's why, according to what I remember
The mitochondria, a small structure in a cell (an organelle), are the energy producers in a cell, and have genetic material of their own, it is a like DNA of it's own. This genetic material is ONLY inherited from the mother (the egg) and not from the sire or sperm.
The reason I remember this is that apparently there was some murder case where a strand of the suspects hair was found, and the only genetic material on it was from mitochondria, and no cell DNA, so since it could have been anyone on the mothers side of the family, it wasn't enough to convict them.
Now I'm thinking of how this could affect breeding.. After all, the mitochondria is the energy supplier of the cell, and perhaps why some cow families are great producers through generations, even when the percentage of DNA of the original cow is getting pretty darned small, the mitochondrial genes are still unchanged. This would of course be especially evident in feed efficiency and milk production, but not calving ease and physical appearance.
Does this sound right to anyone? Can anyone correct me on errors or forgetfulness?