Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Commercial x Charolais
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Texan" data-source="post: 94745" data-attributes="member: 416"><p><em>I</em> mentioned Herefords to Caustic. Didn't consider it jumping on him and it didn't have anything to do with what you asked him. Do you remember the original question in this thread? About using Charolais bulls on commercial cows? I certainly don't mind it when posts stray from the original topic. But, I hope it's alright if I want to get back to it briefly. Caustic is the one that brought up Charolais disposition. I'm just trying to set the record straight about Charolais disposition. I chose to do it by making a comparison to what many on these Boards (myself included) consider the benchmark for good disposition---the Hereford cow. I'm sure that we all understand that there can be tremendous variations in disposition <em>within</em> a breed without using the disposition of an individual to condemn an entire breed. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody was 'ripped' here, Farmhand. We're all grownups, so surely we can have differences of opinion. Crowder said he didn't feel ripped. I haven't noticed Caustic whining any. I still can't figure out why rwtherefords is so upset with me. I disagreed with him. So what? His way is not the only way no more than mine is. And BTW, an OPINION is what I offered, as well. I assume it's okay with you for me to do that?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Didn't say that. Only that the Charolais cow is not necessarily the best way to get Charolais cross calves, <em>in my opinion.</em> Everyone should do what works for them in their environment. All I'm saying is that it is not necessary to build and maintain a bigger cowherd just to produce the desired results of yellow baldy or smokey calves. It seems to me as if some of you are saying that there's no place for English cows in a breeding program with Charolais bulls without having a cow-crippling, vet-enriching disaster. That's simply not true.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Doesn't have anything to do with being in Texas. Moderate-framed English cow compared to a Continental cow? Are your Hereford cows the same size as your Charolais cross cows? Because mine sure as Hell aren't! If they're not, then isn't the Hereford cow a more efficient consumer of your resources, assuming that she will raise the same size crossbred calf as the larger framed cow? In my experience she will do just that. Are you trying to tell everyone that you don't believe that an English cow crossed with a Continental bull to produce a 650 pound calf is more efficient than a Continental cow crossed with an English bull to produce the same calf? I thought I had too many Continental cows gnawing 20-30% more grass than my moderate-framed cows, so I'm sure relieved to hear that!</p><p></p><p></p><p>:lol2: Nope, I don't weigh any calves. I've got better ways to spend my mornings than running all over harassing baby calves and fighting mad cows. Are you trying to tell me that you weigh all of your <em>crossbred</em> calves? I guess you do because you stated the weights. That's admirable of you, but not necessary for most of us. Either a cow can have the calf or she can't. That's really all I need to know. But, I'll tell you this---if I ever get to the point that I can't <em>look</em> at a baby calf and tell within ten pounds of what it weighs, I'll call the auctioneer to come out and look at my stuff because it'll be time for me to get out of this business.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I believe you. I don't doubt that for one minute. Doesn't take a rocket scientist or the AAA computers to figure that one out. But, have you selected your Char X females for low birthweight and calving ease? I try to do that with Charolais bulls. Have you done it with your <em>crossbred</em> females?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I honestly couldn't begin to count how many I've pulled in the past 15 years. But I know for a fact that I've pulled more <em>Hereford</em> calves than that. So what? Is that representative of the Hereford breed or me using poor selection within the breed?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Good grief! You sound like a crybaby! What 'slam' are you referring to? When I say they're more efficient? No, that wouldn't be a slam. When I mentioned that if your Hereford cows couldn't have 80 to 90 pound calves, you had the wrong cows? I said "<em>if</em>." Was that a 'slam?' When I say I've got one with a bad disposition? Maybe that's a 'slam?' Not okay for me to tell anybody that? Maybe I should clear it with the AHA first? Look, if I wanted to 'slam' Hereford cattle, we'd be talking about eyes, udders, teats and prolapses. Do you want to go there? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Great! I figured they could. I would expect them to be able to have 100+ pound calves. I'll say it again---you can consider this an opinion, you can consider it a 'slam' or whatever, but I consider it a <em>fact</em>.....if anybody has English cows (no matter what breed) that can't have an 80 to 90 pound calf like I get out of my Charolais bulls, then they have the wrong cows! <em>Period!</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's what I was doing. I'll ask you the same question I asked Farmhand---Are you the only one that can have an opinion? Not okay for me to?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Texan, post: 94745, member: 416"] [i]I[/i] mentioned Herefords to Caustic. Didn't consider it jumping on him and it didn't have anything to do with what you asked him. Do you remember the original question in this thread? About using Charolais bulls on commercial cows? I certainly don't mind it when posts stray from the original topic. But, I hope it's alright if I want to get back to it briefly. Caustic is the one that brought up Charolais disposition. I'm just trying to set the record straight about Charolais disposition. I chose to do it by making a comparison to what many on these Boards (myself included) consider the benchmark for good disposition---the Hereford cow. I'm sure that we all understand that there can be tremendous variations in disposition [i]within[/i] a breed without using the disposition of an individual to condemn an entire breed. Nobody was 'ripped' here, Farmhand. We're all grownups, so surely we can have differences of opinion. Crowder said he didn't feel ripped. I haven't noticed Caustic whining any. I still can't figure out why rwtherefords is so upset with me. I disagreed with him. So what? His way is not the only way no more than mine is. And BTW, an OPINION is what I offered, as well. I assume it's okay with you for me to do that? Didn't say that. Only that the Charolais cow is not necessarily the best way to get Charolais cross calves, [i]in my opinion.[/i] Everyone should do what works for them in their environment. All I'm saying is that it is not necessary to build and maintain a bigger cowherd just to produce the desired results of yellow baldy or smokey calves. It seems to me as if some of you are saying that there's no place for English cows in a breeding program with Charolais bulls without having a cow-crippling, vet-enriching disaster. That's simply not true. Doesn't have anything to do with being in Texas. Moderate-framed English cow compared to a Continental cow? Are your Hereford cows the same size as your Charolais cross cows? Because mine sure as Hell aren't! If they're not, then isn't the Hereford cow a more efficient consumer of your resources, assuming that she will raise the same size crossbred calf as the larger framed cow? In my experience she will do just that. Are you trying to tell everyone that you don't believe that an English cow crossed with a Continental bull to produce a 650 pound calf is more efficient than a Continental cow crossed with an English bull to produce the same calf? I thought I had too many Continental cows gnawing 20-30% more grass than my moderate-framed cows, so I'm sure relieved to hear that! :lol2: Nope, I don't weigh any calves. I've got better ways to spend my mornings than running all over harassing baby calves and fighting mad cows. Are you trying to tell me that you weigh all of your [i]crossbred[/i] calves? I guess you do because you stated the weights. That's admirable of you, but not necessary for most of us. Either a cow can have the calf or she can't. That's really all I need to know. But, I'll tell you this---if I ever get to the point that I can't [i]look[/i] at a baby calf and tell within ten pounds of what it weighs, I'll call the auctioneer to come out and look at my stuff because it'll be time for me to get out of this business. I believe you. I don't doubt that for one minute. Doesn't take a rocket scientist or the AAA computers to figure that one out. But, have you selected your Char X females for low birthweight and calving ease? I try to do that with Charolais bulls. Have you done it with your [i]crossbred[/i] females? Well, I honestly couldn't begin to count how many I've pulled in the past 15 years. But I know for a fact that I've pulled more [i]Hereford[/i] calves than that. So what? Is that representative of the Hereford breed or me using poor selection within the breed? Good grief! You sound like a crybaby! What 'slam' are you referring to? When I say they're more efficient? No, that wouldn't be a slam. When I mentioned that if your Hereford cows couldn't have 80 to 90 pound calves, you had the wrong cows? I said "[i]if[/i]." Was that a 'slam?' When I say I've got one with a bad disposition? Maybe that's a 'slam?' Not okay for me to tell anybody that? Maybe I should clear it with the AHA first? Look, if I wanted to 'slam' Hereford cattle, we'd be talking about eyes, udders, teats and prolapses. Do you want to go there? Great! I figured they could. I would expect them to be able to have 100+ pound calves. I'll say it again---you can consider this an opinion, you can consider it a 'slam' or whatever, but I consider it a [i]fact[/i].....if anybody has English cows (no matter what breed) that can't have an 80 to 90 pound calf like I get out of my Charolais bulls, then they have the wrong cows! [i]Period![/i] That's what I was doing. I'll ask you the same question I asked Farmhand---Are you the only one that can have an opinion? Not okay for me to? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Commercial x Charolais
Top