Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
CFIA Completes BSE Investigation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldtimer" data-source="post: 234060" data-attributes="member: 97"><p>SEC- Get a chance if you can and read the entire report.Heres a link:</p><p><a href="http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/bseesb/bccb2006/5investe.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/ani ... este.shtml</a></p><p></p><p>From what I gather the last 2 POST feedban cattle are tied back to feed mills that had the same contract trucking firm that hauled product for those mills and did not adequately clean its trucks...But the other post feed ban case is not tied to that trucking firm- which is why they think they have more than 1 violation, and more than 1 infected cow that ended up rendered into feed.....But I could find nowhere in the report who or how many mills the contract trucker hauled for- for how long a period (was he still doing it this year? This would mean years of 2nd and 3rd or 4th generation positives showing up) - and to where?...Is this why they think the cluster area could now include Canadian province(s)? Which provinces did that truckers end material end up in? </p><p></p><p>The problem with the report is that for every question it answers it raises 5 more.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldtimer, post: 234060, member: 97"] SEC- Get a chance if you can and read the entire report.Heres a link: [url=http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/bseesb/bccb2006/5investe.shtml]http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/ani ... este.shtml[/url] From what I gather the last 2 POST feedban cattle are tied back to feed mills that had the same contract trucking firm that hauled product for those mills and did not adequately clean its trucks...But the other post feed ban case is not tied to that trucking firm- which is why they think they have more than 1 violation, and more than 1 infected cow that ended up rendered into feed.....But I could find nowhere in the report who or how many mills the contract trucker hauled for- for how long a period (was he still doing it this year? This would mean years of 2nd and 3rd or 4th generation positives showing up) - and to where?...Is this why they think the cluster area could now include Canadian province(s)? Which provinces did that truckers end material end up in? The problem with the report is that for every question it answers it raises 5 more..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
CFIA Completes BSE Investigation
Top