Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Cattle Pricing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HDRider" data-source="post: 1629666" data-attributes="member: 17025"><p>Part of the climate change attack plan to to remove carbon contribution for developed countries and move it to developing countries (the real purpose of this is to move wealth around, money is made tearing things down, and building things up).</p><p></p><p>I am becoming convinced that our government wants Ag to move totally offshore. All the evidence, which grows every day, points to that. There is no other viable explanation</p><p></p><p>Moving Ag, moves power, and it moves carbon production. </p><p></p><p><em>Brazil is not a developed country. Though it has several characteristics of one, including the largest economy in South America or Central America, Brazil is still considered as developing due to its low GDP per capita, low living standards, high infant mortality rate, and other factors.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Argentina is a developing country, even though it ranks higher than the vast majority of non-developed countries in most metrics.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>China is not a developed country. Despite having the world's second-largest economy and third-largest military, China is still not classified as a developed country. The biggest reason: the country's per capita GDP remains below any accepted minimum threshold for developed-country status</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>https://www.investopedia.com/updates/top-developing-countries/</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HDRider, post: 1629666, member: 17025"] Part of the climate change attack plan to to remove carbon contribution for developed countries and move it to developing countries (the real purpose of this is to move wealth around, money is made tearing things down, and building things up). I am becoming convinced that our government wants Ag to move totally offshore. All the evidence, which grows every day, points to that. There is no other viable explanation Moving Ag, moves power, and it moves carbon production. [i]Brazil is not a developed country. Though it has several characteristics of one, including the largest economy in South America or Central America, Brazil is still considered as developing due to its low GDP per capita, low living standards, high infant mortality rate, and other factors. Argentina is a developing country, even though it ranks higher than the vast majority of non-developed countries in most metrics. China is not a developed country. Despite having the world's second-largest economy and third-largest military, China is still not classified as a developed country. The biggest reason: the country's per capita GDP remains below any accepted minimum threshold for developed-country status https://www.investopedia.com/updates/top-developing-countries/[/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Cattle Pricing
Top