Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Blue: Update for SBBF - Branguscowgirl Attorney
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WalnutCrest" data-source="post: 1177003" data-attributes="member: 21715"><p>I'm a little late to this issue.</p><p></p><p>While I'm not an attorney and it's been a long time since I slept at a Holiday Inn, I do have a couple of quick observations ...</p><p></p><p>Inyati ... you would probably do yourself a great amount of help if you'd reference local ordinances in your defense. Specifically, the sections on "Animal on Animal Aggression" (re: Blue texting photos of his nuts to your heifer) and the section on "Claims Relating to the Loss of Property Owned by Rancher Due to Lackadaisical and Irresponsible Governance of Dog". Wait, that second section might do more harm to your case than good... In any event, if she is a virgin heifer (i.e., never been bull exposed), your case is stronger than if she has been. If she's been AI'd, it's more of a grey area and the jury will need to consider all the facts.</p><p></p><p>BCG ... also in the local codes that would be relevant to Blue's case, there are many references to the fact that if a family member living with another family member 'steals' something, but that 'stolen something' never leaves the property they both live on, then the property isn't actually stolen. We already know the vice grips are accounted for. What about the other things? It would seem to me that the worst case scenario for Blue is that someone might believe he has the dexterity to open the cabinet, get the bourbon down, open the bottle and drink it without help from anyone else ... and in which case, he might have to pay 3x restitution (i.e., three new bottles of hooch for Inyati) ... but, even that seems a bit of a stretch.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and BCG ... this goes to trial, Blue will be declared innocent of all charges.</p><p></p><p>Why?</p><p></p><p>He's required to have a jury of his peers. I cannot imagine a jury of intact male dogs would vote him guilty. He'll skate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WalnutCrest, post: 1177003, member: 21715"] I'm a little late to this issue. While I'm not an attorney and it's been a long time since I slept at a Holiday Inn, I do have a couple of quick observations ... Inyati ... you would probably do yourself a great amount of help if you'd reference local ordinances in your defense. Specifically, the sections on "Animal on Animal Aggression" (re: Blue texting photos of his nuts to your heifer) and the section on "Claims Relating to the Loss of Property Owned by Rancher Due to Lackadaisical and Irresponsible Governance of Dog". Wait, that second section might do more harm to your case than good... In any event, if she is a virgin heifer (i.e., never been bull exposed), your case is stronger than if she has been. If she's been AI'd, it's more of a grey area and the jury will need to consider all the facts. BCG ... also in the local codes that would be relevant to Blue's case, there are many references to the fact that if a family member living with another family member 'steals' something, but that 'stolen something' never leaves the property they both live on, then the property isn't actually stolen. We already know the vice grips are accounted for. What about the other things? It would seem to me that the worst case scenario for Blue is that someone might believe he has the dexterity to open the cabinet, get the bourbon down, open the bottle and drink it without help from anyone else ... and in which case, he might have to pay 3x restitution (i.e., three new bottles of hooch for Inyati) ... but, even that seems a bit of a stretch. Oh, and BCG ... this goes to trial, Blue will be declared innocent of all charges. Why? He's required to have a jury of his peers. I cannot imagine a jury of intact male dogs would vote him guilty. He'll skate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Blue: Update for SBBF - Branguscowgirl Attorney
Top