Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Another shot dead by Mpls police
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greybeard" data-source="post: 1591894" data-attributes="member: 18945"><p>All offenders are to be treated equally under the law. That, is the law according to the constitution..the same constitution that backs our laws that police officers take an oath to defend.</p><p>The split second decision thing doesn't fly with me. Police officers are prone to remind us they put their lives on the line for US, the public. An ethical conflict? If they are putting more emphasis on the value of their own lives over the public's, then they are doing exactly opposite what they claim to be doing and there is no conflict..None of us get to have it both ways.</p><p>To Protect and to Serve.</p><p>It appears in at least this case, the officer was intent on protecting himself and serving his own self interest over the interest of the unarmed & innocent civilian.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greybeard, post: 1591894, member: 18945"] All offenders are to be treated equally under the law. That, is the law according to the constitution..the same constitution that backs our laws that police officers take an oath to defend. The split second decision thing doesn't fly with me. Police officers are prone to remind us they put their lives on the line for US, the public. An ethical conflict? If they are putting more emphasis on the value of their own lives over the public's, then they are doing exactly opposite what they claim to be doing and there is no conflict..None of us get to have it both ways. To Protect and to Serve. It appears in at least this case, the officer was intent on protecting himself and serving his own self interest over the interest of the unarmed & innocent civilian. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Another shot dead by Mpls police
Top