Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Angus Sire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SEC" data-source="post: 172645" data-attributes="member: 3241"><p>From what i have gathered Magnitude was a disappointment from those who I know that have seen him. Very much a disappointment from the other OCC cattle that usually look good.</p><p></p><p>Did you know he was a twin?</p><p>There is another case and point of the semen companies not being straight forward with people. For those that don't care it doesn't matter but for those that have to many twins already won't use a bull that is a twin or has twins in the background.</p><p></p><p>Just like 878 (no I am not going to bash him this time Windy) Until a few years ago nobody knew that he was a twin. </p><p></p><p>I would call not reporting that misrepresentation.</p><p></p><p>In regards to Emblazon Seth, I think that the growth is there. Just the fact that his genetics show him to be a little quick, not a bad thing. </p><p>If we use a bull that's a 100 on YW or 80 lbs do we really see the difference?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SEC, post: 172645, member: 3241"] From what i have gathered Magnitude was a disappointment from those who I know that have seen him. Very much a disappointment from the other OCC cattle that usually look good. Did you know he was a twin? There is another case and point of the semen companies not being straight forward with people. For those that don't care it doesn't matter but for those that have to many twins already won't use a bull that is a twin or has twins in the background. Just like 878 (no I am not going to bash him this time Windy) Until a few years ago nobody knew that he was a twin. I would call not reporting that misrepresentation. In regards to Emblazon Seth, I think that the growth is there. Just the fact that his genetics show him to be a little quick, not a bad thing. If we use a bull that's a 100 on YW or 80 lbs do we really see the difference? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Angus Sire
Top