TNMasterBeefProducer":1u60h2wy said:K2011":1u60h2wy said:Something about his back end just doesn't look right - it doesn't match the front end's muscleing....to me
I agree. I cant quiet put my finger on it but he looks mis proportioned.
K2011":2lrksvnt said:Something about his back end just doesn't look right - it doesn't match the front end's muscleing....to me
EAT BEEF":2iwc4l6i said:K2011":2iwc4l6i said:Something about his back end just doesn't look right - it doesn't match the front end's muscleing....to me
I never was very good at talking reasons,but I would like to see a little more junk in the trunk.
Um, maybe if they are clean fronted and not waisty looking.RD-Sam":121idzb1 said:He is about 2 1/2 in the picture, and no it wasn't doctored up. I have seen him up close and he was an inpressive bull. If his rear is lacking a little, and I am not saying it is, would you think it may be a good breeding if the cow has alot of rump and the bulls in the line breeding had plenty of rump?
RD-Sam":30up6fyn said:I decided to use him. These numbers may help put him in perspective a little better.
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
BW: 79
Adj. WW: 964
Adj. YW: 1530
15 Mo. Weight: 1670
SC: 38 cm
UREA: 17.8
Marb.: .20
RD-Sam":2o2k7es2 said:I decided to use him. These numbers may help put him in perspective a little better.
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
BW: 79
Adj. WW: 964
Adj. YW: 1530
15 Mo. Weight: 1670
SC: 38 cm
UREA: 17.8
Marb.: .20