Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
An illustration of the Democrat Party Economics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="la4angus" data-source="post: 337831" data-attributes="member: 132"><p>An illustration of the Democrat Party Economics</p><p></p><p>> >If any illustration ever helps you understand how the democratic party </p><p>> >economics is derived, this does.</p><p>> ></p><p>> ></p><p>> >It's the right time of year for you to get this information:</p><p>> ></p><p>> >If you don't understand the Democrats' version of tax refunds, maybe this </p><p>> >will help explain it: 50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was </p><p>> >rained out. A refund was then due.</p><p>> ></p><p>> >The team was about to mail refunds when a group of Congressional Democrats </p><p>> >stopped them and suggested that they send out the ticket refunds based on </p><p>> >the Democrat National Committee's interpretation of fairness.</p><p>> ></p><p>> >Originally the refunds were to be paid based on the price each person had </p><p>> >paid for the tickets. Unfortunately that meant most of the refund money </p><p>> >would be going to the ticket holders that had purchased the most expensive </p><p>> >tickets. This, according to the DNC, is considered totally unfair.</p><p>> ></p><p>> >A decision was then made to pay out the refunds in this manner: People in </p><p>> >the $10 seats will get back $15. After all, they have less money to spend </p><p>> >on tickets to begin with. Call it an "Earned Income Ticket Credit." Persons </p><p>> >"earn" it by having few skills, poor work habits, and low ambition, thus </p><p>> >keeping them at entry-level wages. People in the $25 seats will get back </p><p>> >$25, because it "seems fair."</p><p>> ></p><p>> >People in the $50 seats will get back $1, because they already make a lot </p><p>> >of money and don't need a refund. After all, if they can afford a $50 </p><p>> >ticket, they must not be paying enough taxes.</p><p>> ></p><p>> >People in the $75 luxury box seats will each have to pay an additional $25 </p><p>> >because it's the "right thing to do."</p><p>> ></p><p>> >People walking past the stadium that couldn't afford to buy a ticket for </p><p>> >the game each will get a $10 refund, even though they didn't pay anything </p><p>> >for the tickets. They need the most help. Sometimes this is known as </p><p>> >Affirmative Action.</p><p>> ></p><p>> >Now do you understand? If not, contact Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator </p><p>> >Ted Kennedy, Senator John Kerry or Senator Hillary Clinton for assistance.</p><p>> ></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="la4angus, post: 337831, member: 132"] An illustration of the Democrat Party Economics > >If any illustration ever helps you understand how the democratic party > >economics is derived, this does. > > > > > >It's the right time of year for you to get this information: > > > >If you don't understand the Democrats' version of tax refunds, maybe this > >will help explain it: 50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was > >rained out. A refund was then due. > > > >The team was about to mail refunds when a group of Congressional Democrats > >stopped them and suggested that they send out the ticket refunds based on > >the Democrat National Committee's interpretation of fairness. > > > >Originally the refunds were to be paid based on the price each person had > >paid for the tickets. Unfortunately that meant most of the refund money > >would be going to the ticket holders that had purchased the most expensive > >tickets. This, according to the DNC, is considered totally unfair. > > > >A decision was then made to pay out the refunds in this manner: People in > >the $10 seats will get back $15. After all, they have less money to spend > >on tickets to begin with. Call it an "Earned Income Ticket Credit." Persons > >"earn" it by having few skills, poor work habits, and low ambition, thus > >keeping them at entry-level wages. People in the $25 seats will get back > >$25, because it "seems fair." > > > >People in the $50 seats will get back $1, because they already make a lot > >of money and don't need a refund. After all, if they can afford a $50 > >ticket, they must not be paying enough taxes. > > > >People in the $75 luxury box seats will each have to pay an additional $25 > >because it's the "right thing to do." > > > >People walking past the stadium that couldn't afford to buy a ticket for > >the game each will get a $10 refund, even though they didn't pay anything > >for the tickets. They need the most help. Sometimes this is known as > >Affirmative Action. > > > >Now do you understand? If not, contact Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator > >Ted Kennedy, Senator John Kerry or Senator Hillary Clinton for assistance. > > [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
An illustration of the Democrat Party Economics
Top