"thefarmerswife" -- Some folks, myself included, care deeply about the welfare of the animals we have the care of, and vehemently hate anything that seems like inhumane treatment.
My thoughts on the matter -- if the animals are healthy you do your best to keep them that way. If they get sick you put everything you have into saving them (I'm talking about effort and knowledge, not necessarily everything in the drug cabinet and all the money in your pocketbook), and set a deadline for when they have to show improvement. If you can't cure them it is only humane to put them down. Personally, my standards for putting an animal down are as follows:
-any animal who cannot make a full recovery and return to a useful, healthy, normal life
-any animal who is terminally ill
-any animal that is not making improvement past the deadline
-any animal that is suffering
I know we make exceptions in some cases, esp for heavy bred cows, but 99.9% of the time that's what a livestock owner ought to follow.
So... what do you expect ranchers who care about the welfare of animals to say, when you tell them the calf isn't being seen by a vet, isn't being treated, isn't making improvement, and seems to be left to suffer and die on its own??? Observing the calf, turning him daily, and giving feed and water doesn't make the situation humane. Of course we're going to say something; can you expect anything else?