Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Why Herefords are Vanishing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HerefordSire" data-source="post: 686589" data-attributes="member: 4437"><p><em>First off, welcome aboard White FacesPay!</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Do you look at paper pedigrees before you choose a breeding animal?</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Yes. 517 traces back many times. This prospect could produce a highly fertile low birth weight consistant product for hardworking ranchers needing dependability.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Don't forget, this bull prospect could outperform his sire. It makes my mouth "snake" just thinking about the possibilities.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Finally! Now we are getting somewhere. Very good objections. The answer may lie in looking deeper in the pedigree even before 517 as in the case of 774. Guess what? They meet in a highly fertile famous linebred bull!</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>What kind of odds are we talking about here for this bull prospect based upon all the ancestors?</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>The bull prospect is not a breed leader for CHB or CEZ. This doesn't mean he can't sire 1,000 calves without a birthing issue. Does it?</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>I do not think you are a fool. As a metter of fact, I believe you are very brave. Again, do you look at paper pedigrees before you choose a breeding animal?</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Judging by the Picasso (pedigree), I am thinking this one prospect could help many hardworking ranchers make a better living.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HerefordSire, post: 686589, member: 4437"] [i]First off, welcome aboard White FacesPay![/i] [i]Do you look at paper pedigrees before you choose a breeding animal?[/i] [i]Yes. 517 traces back many times. This prospect could produce a highly fertile low birth weight consistant product for hardworking ranchers needing dependability.[/i] [i]Don't forget, this bull prospect could outperform his sire. It makes my mouth "snake" just thinking about the possibilities.[/i] [i]Finally! Now we are getting somewhere. Very good objections. The answer may lie in looking deeper in the pedigree even before 517 as in the case of 774. Guess what? They meet in a highly fertile famous linebred bull![/i] [i]What kind of odds are we talking about here for this bull prospect based upon all the ancestors?[/i] [i]The bull prospect is not a breed leader for CHB or CEZ. This doesn't mean he can't sire 1,000 calves without a birthing issue. Does it?[/i] [i]I do not think you are a fool. As a metter of fact, I believe you are very brave. Again, do you look at paper pedigrees before you choose a breeding animal?[/i] [i]Judging by the Picasso (pedigree), I am thinking this one prospect could help many hardworking ranchers make a better living.[/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Why Herefords are Vanishing
Top