Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
What's wrong with this picture
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChrisB" data-source="post: 919721" data-attributes="member: 122"><p>Maybe it's kind of a regional thing, but my kids have serveral hoodies. Every sports team they are on orders team apparel and 9 times out of 10 part of the apparel is a hooded sweatshirt. I am 43 years old and I have a couple myself. Also, around here 7:30 isn't really considered the middle of the night.</p><p></p><p>Also there appears to be some confusion on the voice identification. It's really not as simple as 30-40 years ago with somebody sitting in a room listening to a couple of recordings. It is all done with computers in ways most of us would not understand. That being said, from what the "experts" are claiming you would expect to find at least a 60% match in the voice characteristics with an individual between two recordings. They claim the 2 recordings of Zimmerman only had a <strong>48%</strong> match, and in their practice that is 'almost' a sure thing that the voices are two seperate people. I think the '48% match' part is misunderstood as a 50/50 chance. This kind of reminds me of the OJ Simpson case when the lawyers convinced the jury that DNA evidence was "funny science" and couldn't be depended on. Whether it is or isn't I don't know, but I think it will be a major part of the case.</p><p></p><p>As for the accident comment, here is the transcript from the show. You can make your own interpetation of what she was trying to say:</p><p></p><p><strong><em> Asked what she would say to Zimmerman if she got the chance, Sybrina Fulton said she wanted an apology. "I believe it was an accident," she said. "I believe that it just got out of control and (Zimmerman) couldn't turn the clock back." </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>"I would ask him, did he know that that was a minor, that that was a teenager, and that he did not have a weapon?" she continued. "I understand his family is hurting, but think about our family that lost our teenage son." She said she wanted to see him stand trial even if it meant he might be found not guilty. "We are happy he was arrested so that he can give his side of the story."</em></strong></p><p></p><p>As upset as we get with the media for reporting 1/2 truths or editing quotes in order to make Zimmerman look guilty, I don't think it is right for us to be doing the same thing to make him look innocent either. Hopefully all the facts come out in the trial and the proper verdict will be given.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChrisB, post: 919721, member: 122"] Maybe it's kind of a regional thing, but my kids have serveral hoodies. Every sports team they are on orders team apparel and 9 times out of 10 part of the apparel is a hooded sweatshirt. I am 43 years old and I have a couple myself. Also, around here 7:30 isn't really considered the middle of the night. Also there appears to be some confusion on the voice identification. It's really not as simple as 30-40 years ago with somebody sitting in a room listening to a couple of recordings. It is all done with computers in ways most of us would not understand. That being said, from what the "experts" are claiming you would expect to find at least a 60% match in the voice characteristics with an individual between two recordings. They claim the 2 recordings of Zimmerman only had a [b]48%[/b] match, and in their practice that is 'almost' a sure thing that the voices are two seperate people. I think the '48% match' part is misunderstood as a 50/50 chance. This kind of reminds me of the OJ Simpson case when the lawyers convinced the jury that DNA evidence was "funny science" and couldn't be depended on. Whether it is or isn't I don't know, but I think it will be a major part of the case. As for the accident comment, here is the transcript from the show. You can make your own interpetation of what she was trying to say: [b][i] Asked what she would say to Zimmerman if she got the chance, Sybrina Fulton said she wanted an apology. "I believe it was an accident," she said. "I believe that it just got out of control and (Zimmerman) couldn’t turn the clock back." "I would ask him, did he know that that was a minor, that that was a teenager, and that he did not have a weapon?" she continued. "I understand his family is hurting, but think about our family that lost our teenage son." She said she wanted to see him stand trial even if it meant he might be found not guilty. "We are happy he was arrested so that he can give his side of the story."[/i][/b] As upset as we get with the media for reporting 1/2 truths or editing quotes in order to make Zimmerman look guilty, I don't think it is right for us to be doing the same thing to make him look innocent either. Hopefully all the facts come out in the trial and the proper verdict will be given. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
What's wrong with this picture
Top