Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
What's happening
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lavacarancher" data-source="post: 639785" data-attributes="member: 9198"><p>Yes sir, you are correct. That's what the EPA is purposing. The fart tax ($87.50/hd) is based on that assumption. It takes twice as much grass/green stuff to sequester the same amount of carbon dioxide as emitted by cattle. Or said another way half as many cattle on the same amount of land. I know that's not exactly what you meant but it is a pretty good parallel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lavacarancher, post: 639785, member: 9198"] Yes sir, you are correct. That's what the EPA is purposing. The fart tax ($87.50/hd) is based on that assumption. It takes twice as much grass/green stuff to sequester the same amount of carbon dioxide as emitted by cattle. Or said another way half as many cattle on the same amount of land. I know that's not exactly what you meant but it is a pretty good parallel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
What's happening
Top