Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Trucks, Tractors & Machinery
Tractor hp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sage" data-source="post: 476208" data-attributes="member: 5352"><p>The tractor weight is more important than the actual HP. I know of a JD 5400 that is used and it is scary, OK on level ground with a reliable operator. I know of several Farmall Ms used to move round bales, less HP but more iron. We used a 2950 JD(80hp?) for a while and it seemed good, now we use a 4055(105hp) with MFWD and it is soooooo much better. Handles the weight better and the front wheel assist is stronger and the front tires don't sink so bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sage, post: 476208, member: 5352"] The tractor weight is more important than the actual HP. I know of a JD 5400 that is used and it is scary, OK on level ground with a reliable operator. I know of several Farmall Ms used to move round bales, less HP but more iron. We used a 2950 JD(80hp?) for a while and it seemed good, now we use a 4055(105hp) with MFWD and it is soooooo much better. Handles the weight better and the front wheel assist is stronger and the front tires don't sink so bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Trucks, Tractors & Machinery
Tractor hp
Top