Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
The EPA and some good news for US.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Margonme" data-source="post: 1393408" data-attributes="member: 25776"><p>I am not debating the merits of the EPA or comparing one agency to another.</p><p></p><p>Your original post was on the subject of freezing grants and cooperative agreement funding. The most aggressive attempt to curtail the EPA was during the Reagan Administration:</p><p></p><p><strong>Anne Irene McGill Gorsuch Burford (April 21, 1942 – July 18, 2004), also known as Anne M. Gorsuch, was an American attorney and politician. Between 1981 and 1983, while known as Anne M. Gorsuch, she served under President Ronald Reagan as the first female Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).</strong></p><p></p><p>Perhaps Trump can be more successful. I will add one thought, only commentary:</p><p></p><p>Any meaningful longterm changes in the duties and mission of an agency have to occur through legislative action. The administrator of the EPA must pursue the mandates of Congress, its the core of the agency's mission. The Government Accounting Office, the Office of the Inspector General and ultimately the Supreme Court will see to that. Not to mention all the court actions that environmental activist will file if the agency ignores its legal obligations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Margonme, post: 1393408, member: 25776"] I am not debating the merits of the EPA or comparing one agency to another. Your original post was on the subject of freezing grants and cooperative agreement funding. The most aggressive attempt to curtail the EPA was during the Reagan Administration: [b]Anne Irene McGill Gorsuch Burford (April 21, 1942 – July 18, 2004), also known as Anne M. Gorsuch, was an American attorney and politician. Between 1981 and 1983, while known as Anne M. Gorsuch, she served under President Ronald Reagan as the first female Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).[/b] Perhaps Trump can be more successful. I will add one thought, only commentary: Any meaningful longterm changes in the duties and mission of an agency have to occur through legislative action. The administrator of the EPA must pursue the mandates of Congress, its the core of the agency's mission. The Government Accounting Office, the Office of the Inspector General and ultimately the Supreme Court will see to that. Not to mention all the court actions that environmental activist will file if the agency ignores its legal obligations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
The EPA and some good news for US.
Top