Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Shocking phone bill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="john250" data-source="post: 490514" data-attributes="member: 4406"><p>I agree. I doubt the attorney is necessary. I doubt a small claims judge would rule against Lammie because 1. The exact same number was previously toll free and I think she said it was dialed without a prefix. 2. AOL said it was toll free 3. It costs money to take Lammie to court. 4. She lives in the district which elects the judge. The phone company doesn't live there or vote. I suppose the phone company might want to make an example, but they will lose money doing it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="john250, post: 490514, member: 4406"] I agree. I doubt the attorney is necessary. I doubt a small claims judge would rule against Lammie because 1. The exact same number was previously toll free and I think she said it was dialed without a prefix. 2. AOL said it was toll free 3. It costs money to take Lammie to court. 4. She lives in the district which elects the judge. The phone company doesn't live there or vote. I suppose the phone company might want to make an example, but they will lose money doing it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Shocking phone bill
Top