Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Recipient Cows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DOC HARRIS" data-source="post: 301219" data-attributes="member: 1683"><p>slazyk- :? :???: Perhaps I don't quite understand your reluctance to use ET. Is it because you are convinced that the <em>process</em> of inserting the embryo's was the reason that the calf has no tail - and/or the calves resulting did not look or perform up to your expectations because they were transfers? The inherited genetics derived from the bull and the cow to whom he was mated has EVERYTHING to do with the resulting calf. The recepient cow into whom the embryo was implanted has NO genetic effect on the calf! NONE! Insofar as the 'tail' problem is concerned, that COULD have been the result of a careless impregnation - or perhaps a genetic mal-formation. But it was NOT the fault of the recipient females. </p><p></p><p>Maybe I don't understand your reasoning. Help me out here, please.</p><p></p><p>DOC HARRIS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DOC HARRIS, post: 301219, member: 1683"] slazyk- :? :???: Perhaps I don't quite understand your reluctance to use ET. Is it because you are convinced that the [i]process[/i] of inserting the embryo's was the reason that the calf has no tail - and/or the calves resulting did not look or perform up to your expectations because they were transfers? The inherited genetics derived from the bull and the cow to whom he was mated has EVERYTHING to do with the resulting calf. The recepient cow into whom the embryo was implanted has NO genetic effect on the calf! NONE! Insofar as the 'tail' problem is concerned, that COULD have been the result of a careless impregnation - or perhaps a genetic mal-formation. But it was NOT the fault of the recipient females. Maybe I don't understand your reasoning. Help me out here, please. DOC HARRIS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Recipient Cows
Top