Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Real World Data VS EPDS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alexfarms" data-source="post: 693862" data-attributes="member: 8677"><p>Since you are using your steers as examples, give us a little more information. The two biggest indicators of IMF score(quality grade) are age(days on feed) and back fat thickness. How do these two factors correlate to how your calves ranked in quality grade?</p><p></p><p>Do you realize that you are, on one hand, praising the importance of untrasound data and their associated epds and on the other hand giving examples that discredit the ultrasound epds? Sometimes if is hard to grasp the obvious isn't it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alexfarms, post: 693862, member: 8677"] Since you are using your steers as examples, give us a little more information. The two biggest indicators of IMF score(quality grade) are age(days on feed) and back fat thickness. How do these two factors correlate to how your calves ranked in quality grade? Do you realize that you are, on one hand, praising the importance of untrasound data and their associated epds and on the other hand giving examples that discredit the ultrasound epds? Sometimes if is hard to grasp the obvious isn't it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Real World Data VS EPDS
Top