Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
Processing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dega Moo" data-source="post: 1088421" data-attributes="member: 19930"><p>The long and currently accepted values for calories is 9 for fat and 5 for protein, regardless of the preference of the body for either as a fuel. But that doesn't really matter in the numbers you provided because your example is dominated by the 'fact' that there's less total protein and fat in 3.5oz of longhorn beef than in 3.5oz of white meat chicken ( for that matter in all of the examples on the web page). The only way that can occur is there is more water in the longhorn beef sample. Factually, there must be 6.2 grams more water in that Longhorn serving. </p><p></p><p>Can you effectively explain how that comes to pass as equivalent samples? </p><p></p><p>Please note that I'm not attacking the concept that eating Longhorn beef is healthy as I believe red meat is or can be healthy. Nor am I questioning lower cholesterol numbers of grass fed beef. I am questioning the facts being used to support the original implied contention and that of the cited web page that Longhorn beef is healthier than the other protein sources listed or provides fewer calories that other breeds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dega Moo, post: 1088421, member: 19930"] The long and currently accepted values for calories is 9 for fat and 5 for protein, regardless of the preference of the body for either as a fuel. But that doesn't really matter in the numbers you provided because your example is dominated by the 'fact' that there's less total protein and fat in 3.5oz of longhorn beef than in 3.5oz of white meat chicken ( for that matter in all of the examples on the web page). The only way that can occur is there is more water in the longhorn beef sample. Factually, there must be 6.2 grams more water in that Longhorn serving. Can you effectively explain how that comes to pass as equivalent samples? Please note that I'm not attacking the concept that eating Longhorn beef is healthy as I believe red meat is or can be healthy. Nor am I questioning lower cholesterol numbers of grass fed beef. I am questioning the facts being used to support the original implied contention and that of the cited web page that Longhorn beef is healthier than the other protein sources listed or provides fewer calories that other breeds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
Processing
Top