Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Pensions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jogeephus" data-source="post: 673799" data-attributes="member: 4362"><p>As best as I can remember he said that he started work with them when he was 17. Quit and joined the Navy. Did a tour or two then came back to work for state. Quit the state and worked for private then went back to the state. State lawmakers decided that anyone who had given 30 years service should retire with same benefits as someone who was 65 since this would be fair. So they looked at his employment sheet and it showed his work history with them began when he was 17 and since he was 50 this meant he worked 33 years and under the legislatures ruling he would qualify as a 65 year old person. This loophole was closed 2 years after they realized what they had done. </p><p></p><p>I don't know much about the second fella cause this is just what I was told by one of his friends. The legislature, in an attempt to help veterans out, passed the rule so they would not be penalized if they were drafted while employed by the state. What they didn't figure on is that some people might like the service and may not want to leave. In this event, they didn't have a policy for this situation and the wording is the law. </p><p></p><p>Sweet deal for everyone but the taxpayer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jogeephus, post: 673799, member: 4362"] As best as I can remember he said that he started work with them when he was 17. Quit and joined the Navy. Did a tour or two then came back to work for state. Quit the state and worked for private then went back to the state. State lawmakers decided that anyone who had given 30 years service should retire with same benefits as someone who was 65 since this would be fair. So they looked at his employment sheet and it showed his work history with them began when he was 17 and since he was 50 this meant he worked 33 years and under the legislatures ruling he would qualify as a 65 year old person. This loophole was closed 2 years after they realized what they had done. I don't know much about the second fella cause this is just what I was told by one of his friends. The legislature, in an attempt to help veterans out, passed the rule so they would not be penalized if they were drafted while employed by the state. What they didn't figure on is that some people might like the service and may not want to leave. In this event, they didn't have a policy for this situation and the wording is the law. Sweet deal for everyone but the taxpayer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Pensions
Top