Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
Pelleted, treated feeds may boost digestion in growing cattle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LCCattle" data-source="post: 1346219" data-attributes="member: 23661"><p>Inyati13,</p><p>To bring you up to speed I would have to go all the way back to 1981 and search some other board for the proof. So here is proof of what I just now stated. The fed manufacturer was made to pay restitution. I make no judgment of guilt, I am merely showing you how important and down and dirty this can get. </p><p>Now if you demand proof, it may take me awhile to find it searching other boards, so only do so if you feel it is really necessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Plaintiff Newman filed suit in Alabama circuit court against defendant Cameron (a feed commodities broker), defendant Staley Manufacturing Company (a manufacturer of cattle feed), and other defendants who were dismissed from the suit before trial. Plaintiff alleged that defendants produced, brokered, and sold cattle feed that, when fed to plaintiff's cattle, caused death to a great number of the cattle, caused illness among the herd, caused interruption of plaintiff's feeding and maintenance program, and otherwise adversely and injuriously affected plaintiff's cattle. Alleging diversity jurisdiction defendants removed the case to federal court. Following jury verdicts for plaintiff Newman and defendant Cameron, defendant Staley Manufacturing Company appeals. </p><p><a href="http://openjurist.org/648/f2d/330" target="_blank">http://openjurist.org/648/f2d/330</a></p><p>Now the short of it is:</p><p>In this case the "feed" manufacture was found to be at fault and ordered to pay restitution, although WHAT was in the feed,that killed the cattle, was not determined at trial. at some later date it was determined that the toxin in the feed was sulfur, and the feed manufacture ( Staleys, who also manufatured ethanol ) had full knowledge that the feed was toxic as was/is all other ethanol DDG & DDGS to this day, unless FSIS has recently put an end to it. </p><p>TBC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LCCattle, post: 1346219, member: 23661"] Inyati13, To bring you up to speed I would have to go all the way back to 1981 and search some other board for the proof. So here is proof of what I just now stated. The fed manufacturer was made to pay restitution. I make no judgment of guilt, I am merely showing you how important and down and dirty this can get. Now if you demand proof, it may take me awhile to find it searching other boards, so only do so if you feel it is really necessary. Plaintiff Newman filed suit in Alabama circuit court against defendant Cameron (a feed commodities broker), defendant Staley Manufacturing Company (a manufacturer of cattle feed), and other defendants who were dismissed from the suit before trial. Plaintiff alleged that defendants produced, brokered, and sold cattle feed that, when fed to plaintiff's cattle, caused death to a great number of the cattle, caused illness among the herd, caused interruption of plaintiff's feeding and maintenance program, and otherwise adversely and injuriously affected plaintiff's cattle. Alleging diversity jurisdiction defendants removed the case to federal court. Following jury verdicts for plaintiff Newman and defendant Cameron, defendant Staley Manufacturing Company appeals. [url=http://openjurist.org/648/f2d/330]http://openjurist.org/648/f2d/330[/url] Now the short of it is: In this case the “feed” manufacture was found to be at fault and ordered to pay restitution, although WHAT was in the feed,that killed the cattle, was not determined at trial. at some later date it was determined that the toxin in the feed was sulfur, and the feed manufacture ( Staleys, who also manufatured ethanol ) had full knowledge that the feed was toxic as was/is all other ethanol DDG & DDGS to this day, unless FSIS has recently put an end to it. TBC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Beginners Board
Pelleted, treated feeds may boost digestion in growing cattle
Top