Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
Opposition to OTM Border Rule Growing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldtimer" data-source="post: 360504" data-attributes="member: 97"><p>R-CALF: Producers Welcome Growing Opposition to USDA's Proposed OTM Rule </p><p> </p><p> CattleNetwork_Today 3/29/2007 1:34:00 PM </p><p></p><p></p><p>R-CALF: Producers Welcome Growing Opposition to USDA's Proposed OTM Rule</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Washington, D.C. – Cattle producers are pleased that <strong>a bipartisan group of 13 U.S. Representatives wrote a letter earlier this month to oppose the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) proposed rule (Rule 2) that would permit live Canadian cattle born after March 1, 1999, to be imported into the United States. </strong></p><p> </p><p></p><p>The group sent a formal letter to Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns March 12. Authors of the letter to USDA were: Rep. Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa; Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash; Rep. Randy Kuhl, R-N.Y.; Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.; Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo.; Rep. John McHugh, R-N.Y.; Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif; Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.; Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash.; Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-Mich.; Rep. Dennis Rehberg, R-Mont.; Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C.; Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>The letter stated in part that if Canadian cattle born on or after March 1, 1999, are allowed to reside in the U.S., then <strong>"any of those cattle later testing positive for BSE would have severely detrimental effects on our cattle and dairy industries within the United States…</strong> </p><p></p><p><strong>"We must ensure that we protect the United States food supply and continue to give safety assurances to our trading partners,"</strong> the letter continued. <strong>"We are concerned about the potential implications this change may have. We therefore urge the USDA to not finalize the proposed regulations allowing importation of cattle from Canada for breeding or herd replacement purposes, and that a thorough re-evaluation be conducted."</strong></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Also, Rep. Stephanie Herseth, D-S.D., had requested – as had R-CALF USA and others – that the comment period on this proposed rule be extended for 60 days, but USDA granted none of those requests, keeping the March 12 deadline for public comments intact.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Additionally, Consumers Union, the non-profit membership organization that publishes the widely read Consumers Reports, submitted to USDA a petition – signed by 17,655 citizens representing every state in the union – against Rule 2, stating in part that USDA "<strong>should prohibit imports of Canadian cattle until better safeguards are in place in the US to protect the human food supply from mad cow disease. Canada appears to have a significant problem with mad cow disease. The USDA's plan to reopen the border to older cattle and to blood products and intestines is simply not cautious enough."</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>In early February, a bipartisan group of four U.S. Senators sent a letter to USDA in opposition to Rule 2, stating that "expanding Canadian cattle imports increases the possibility that a future case of BSE in a Canadian animal may be found in the United States." The letter was sent by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>"R-CALF thanks these Representatives, Senators, and citizens for stepping to the plate to protect the interests of independent U.S. cattle producers and U.S. consumers, and we encourage other members of Congress to follow this lead in urging USDA to withdraw this proposed rule at once," said R-CALF USA President and Region VI Director Max Thornsberry, a veterinarian who also chairs the R-CALF USA Animal Health Committee.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Thornsberry explained that in 2006, R-CALF USA's membership had voted overwhelmingly to challenge and stop USDA from allowing the importation of beef products from cattle older than 30 months of age, as well as the importation of live cattle over 30 months of age, from Japan or any other BSE-affected country.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>"It is encouraging to see that so many members of Congress and consumers share and understand the legitimate concerns of America's farmers and ranchers," he said. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Note: To view a copy of the Representatives' letter, the Senators' letter, Herseth's request for an extension, and Consumer Union's petition, please visit the "BSE-Litigation" link at <a href="http://www.r-calfusa.com" target="_blank">http://www.r-calfusa.com</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldtimer, post: 360504, member: 97"] R-CALF: Producers Welcome Growing Opposition to USDA’s Proposed OTM Rule CattleNetwork_Today 3/29/2007 1:34:00 PM R-CALF: Producers Welcome Growing Opposition to USDA’s Proposed OTM Rule Washington, D.C. – Cattle producers are pleased that [b]a bipartisan group of 13 U.S. Representatives wrote a letter earlier this month to oppose the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) proposed rule (Rule 2) that would permit live Canadian cattle born after March 1, 1999, to be imported into the United States. [/b] The group sent a formal letter to Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns March 12. Authors of the letter to USDA were: Rep. Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa; Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash; Rep. Randy Kuhl, R-N.Y.; Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.; Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo.; Rep. John McHugh, R-N.Y.; Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif; Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.; Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash.; Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-Mich.; Rep. Dennis Rehberg, R-Mont.; Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C.; Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif. The letter stated in part that if Canadian cattle born on or after March 1, 1999, are allowed to reside in the U.S., then [b]“any of those cattle later testing positive for BSE would have severely detrimental effects on our cattle and dairy industries within the United States…[/b] [b]“We must ensure that we protect the United States food supply and continue to give safety assurances to our trading partners,”[/b] the letter continued. [b]“We are concerned about the potential implications this change may have. We therefore urge the USDA to not finalize the proposed regulations allowing importation of cattle from Canada for breeding or herd replacement purposes, and that a thorough re-evaluation be conducted.”[/b] Also, Rep. Stephanie Herseth, D-S.D., had requested – as had R-CALF USA and others – that the comment period on this proposed rule be extended for 60 days, but USDA granted none of those requests, keeping the March 12 deadline for public comments intact. Additionally, Consumers Union, the non-profit membership organization that publishes the widely read Consumers Reports, submitted to USDA a petition – signed by 17,655 citizens representing every state in the union – against Rule 2, stating in part that USDA “[b]should prohibit imports of Canadian cattle until better safeguards are in place in the US to protect the human food supply from mad cow disease. Canada appears to have a significant problem with mad cow disease. The USDA’s plan to reopen the border to older cattle and to blood products and intestines is simply not cautious enough.”[/b] In early February, a bipartisan group of four U.S. Senators sent a letter to USDA in opposition to Rule 2, stating that “expanding Canadian cattle imports increases the possibility that a future case of BSE in a Canadian animal may be found in the United States.” The letter was sent by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. “R-CALF thanks these Representatives, Senators, and citizens for stepping to the plate to protect the interests of independent U.S. cattle producers and U.S. consumers, and we encourage other members of Congress to follow this lead in urging USDA to withdraw this proposed rule at once,” said R-CALF USA President and Region VI Director Max Thornsberry, a veterinarian who also chairs the R-CALF USA Animal Health Committee. Thornsberry explained that in 2006, R-CALF USA’s membership had voted overwhelmingly to challenge and stop USDA from allowing the importation of beef products from cattle older than 30 months of age, as well as the importation of live cattle over 30 months of age, from Japan or any other BSE-affected country. “It is encouraging to see that so many members of Congress and consumers share and understand the legitimate concerns of America’s farmers and ranchers,” he said. Note: To view a copy of the Representatives’ letter, the Senators’ letter, Herseth’s request for an extension, and Consumer Union’s petition, please visit the “BSE-Litigation” link at [url=http://www.r-calfusa.com]http://www.r-calfusa.com[/url]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
Opposition to OTM Border Rule Growing
Top