Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
More solar farm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brute 23" data-source="post: 1682732" data-attributes="member: 6291"><p>It would still not even be close. True NG wells and the infrastructure to transport it take up very little land, usually dont interfere with much, and require minimal maintenance to operate.</p><p></p><p>NG is still one of the most efficient, environmentally friendly sources of energy we have. It just got a bad wrap because it got lumped in with oil. Chesapeake had the right idea trying to branch off. If more people would have got on board with that and they had ran a better PR game these "renewables" wouldn't have had a chance. Oil was just too big and thought it couldn't be unseated.</p><p></p><p>Now with the govt involved they will pick the winners and losers.</p><p></p><p>I go to the Rosebud, Lott, Westphalia, etc area pretty often. Had some friends that were contacted about the solars. It's a nice place. I like the area between Rosebud and Cameron along the river. From what I heard you cant hardly touch it. The money has moved in and is buying most of it up. Greens is an hidden treasure IMO. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😄" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes :smile:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f604.png" data-shortname=":smile:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brute 23, post: 1682732, member: 6291"] It would still not even be close. True NG wells and the infrastructure to transport it take up very little land, usually dont interfere with much, and require minimal maintenance to operate. NG is still one of the most efficient, environmentally friendly sources of energy we have. It just got a bad wrap because it got lumped in with oil. Chesapeake had the right idea trying to branch off. If more people would have got on board with that and they had ran a better PR game these "renewables" wouldn't have had a chance. Oil was just too big and thought it couldn't be unseated. Now with the govt involved they will pick the winners and losers. I go to the Rosebud, Lott, Westphalia, etc area pretty often. Had some friends that were contacted about the solars. It's a nice place. I like the area between Rosebud and Cameron along the river. From what I heard you cant hardly touch it. The money has moved in and is buying most of it up. Greens is an hidden treasure IMO. 😄 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
More solar farm
Top