Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Legal rights of ways question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brute 23" data-source="post: 1689941" data-attributes="member: 6291"><p>There is no lease, ever, that can give a tenant the right to tear down a fence that the land owner (lessor) does not even own 100% of. At best they can grant you their 50%. If that is the case the tenant needs to provide that documentation to the OP showing he has the power to negotiate that. </p><p></p><p>I am not defending sold land. It's none of my business no do I care. That is between the two land owners to decide how to go forward. </p><p></p><p>For all we know the other land owner wants the fence to stay where it is to stay in the OP good graces so he/she can continue to use that access point.</p><p></p><p>There are way too many variables here to "take sides". Ultimately the two land owners have to decide how to proceed. </p><p></p><p>Any way you cut it the tenant is not helping the situation and needs to be squashed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brute 23, post: 1689941, member: 6291"] There is no lease, ever, that can give a tenant the right to tear down a fence that the land owner (lessor) does not even own 100% of. At best they can grant you their 50%. If that is the case the tenant needs to provide that documentation to the OP showing he has the power to negotiate that. I am not defending sold land. It's none of my business no do I care. That is between the two land owners to decide how to go forward. For all we know the other land owner wants the fence to stay where it is to stay in the OP good graces so he/she can continue to use that access point. There are way too many variables here to "take sides". Ultimately the two land owners have to decide how to proceed. Any way you cut it the tenant is not helping the situation and needs to be squashed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Legal rights of ways question
Top