Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Implants
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 2679"><p>But there is research that shows agressive implanting can affect the quality of the beef. If cattle are implanted at a time they are not able to get high quality nutrition, they will not marble. But as long as they have plenty of high quality feed, they put down the marbling as their genetics allow. I see that the EU is going to the WTO again about implanted beef, even though they have NEVER been able to show it's harmful.</p><p></p><p>> "Better for you, better for</p><p>> the animals, better for the</p><p>> consumers."</p><p></p><p>> Where did you get this</p><p>> information? I can't seem to find</p><p>> any evidence that implants are</p><p>> harmful in anyway. Do a little</p><p>> research and see exactly what an</p><p>> implant does instead of listening</p><p>> to the scare tactics of certain</p><p>> radical groups. An egg for example</p><p>> has about 200 times the amount of</p><p>> estradial as an equivalent serving</p><p>> of beef. One bottle of beer has</p><p>> more estrogen than a whole beef</p><p>> implanted with an estrogen based</p><p>> hormone. If the FDA finds that</p><p>> implants are unhealthy or</p><p>> dangerous I would be the first one</p><p>> to quit using them.</p><p></p><p>> Implants are well worth the time</p><p>> and money spent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 2679"] But there is research that shows agressive implanting can affect the quality of the beef. If cattle are implanted at a time they are not able to get high quality nutrition, they will not marble. But as long as they have plenty of high quality feed, they put down the marbling as their genetics allow. I see that the EU is going to the WTO again about implanted beef, even though they have NEVER been able to show it's harmful. > "Better for you, better for > the animals, better for the > consumers." > Where did you get this > information? I can't seem to find > any evidence that implants are > harmful in anyway. Do a little > research and see exactly what an > implant does instead of listening > to the scare tactics of certain > radical groups. An egg for example > has about 200 times the amount of > estradial as an equivalent serving > of beef. One bottle of beer has > more estrogen than a whole beef > implanted with an estrogen based > hormone. If the FDA finds that > implants are unhealthy or > dangerous I would be the first one > to quit using them. > Implants are well worth the time > and money spent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Implants
Top