Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
I'm Racist ?????????
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gimpyrancher" data-source="post: 1121830" data-attributes="member: 10164"><p>Hey Caustic,</p><p></p><p>Like they say about pornography, I may not be able to define it but I know it when I see it. Wasn't that the conservative definition of the time? Why change now? I'm not complaining about the guy living high off his labor. I'm speaking of the guy that lives off all the special benefits not available to everyone. It used to be that even being in the middle class was considered living a rich life. Only because they could afford a family, a home and food to feed themselves.</p><p></p><p>> The reason most of everything has gone overseas is regulation and taxes.</p><p></p><p>Regulations and taxes that were passed by the ultra rich. The poor don't have access to the policy makers.</p><p></p><p>> The Blue party has slid so far to the left they have passed socialism headed for the hammer and sickle.</p><p></p><p>Again, the rich altering the country's founding fathers.</p><p></p><p>> A democrat of my youth would be considered a far right Republican today. </p><p></p><p>There is nothing about either party that would be recognizable 100 years ago. Neither party represents the majority of Americans anymore.</p><p></p><p>> I will pose a question when was the country and dollar stronger under more conservative principles 50 years ago or the liberal principles of today.</p><p></p><p>Forget 50 years. Just ask that question since Reagan.</p><p></p><p>> Just look how much our inter cities have improved and how cities like have grown with the socialism march like Detroit.</p><p></p><p>Cheaper to send the jobs overseas for cheap laborer to benefit other countries. Ask a better question for clarification. Are "American Corporations" financially better off now or when they made things in America with far more local competition? Now they want to bring in their overseas billions without paying taxes or telling us where that money came from. Yet the individual is required to pay U.S. taxes on "world wide income" if we leave the states.</p><p></p><p>> The list goes on and on the blue party has destroyed American's industrial power.</p><p></p><p>Which party owns more of the corporations? The destruction of American's industrial power wasn't distorted by the poorer party. It was destroyed by the rich passing laws and regulations that benefitted them over America. Well, that and owning the Supreme Court also helps.</p><p></p><p>> They have used Gestapo like tactic's and march in lock step it is called the EPA.</p><p></p><p>More accurately it is called the Tea Party. Again, it's not the poor that is polluting the water and air internationally. But I can see how you might disagree.</p><p></p><p>> Never in my life time did I think would see a President of any party stop Americans from getting good paying jobs.</p><p></p><p>That is funny. Where exactly are the jobs you claim someone is stopping us from accessing? I guess making up the facts is easier than researching the truth. The good paying jobs have been shipped out of the U.S. Partially because we have stopped educating our masses without cost. We've pared down our education so far that we learn only from books and not from hands on learning. What high schools still offer the classes we all were exposed to 50 years ago? Who is it that is profiting off the $100+ books required in colleges?</p><p></p><p>> All part of the agenda to enslave</p><p></p><p>And you really believe that the poor are enslaving the rich? I have to admit, that one surprised me.</p><p></p><p>> And thus the journey as Mr Franklin predicted.</p><p>"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."</p><p>And we have arrived.</p><p></p><p>I hate to use facts and history to confuse you. But name a country that is "corrupt and vicious" that isn't run by the "masters" you seem to love? Virtue does not have anything to do with those that run this country anymore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gimpyrancher, post: 1121830, member: 10164"] Hey Caustic, Like they say about pornography, I may not be able to define it but I know it when I see it. Wasn't that the conservative definition of the time? Why change now? I'm not complaining about the guy living high off his labor. I'm speaking of the guy that lives off all the special benefits not available to everyone. It used to be that even being in the middle class was considered living a rich life. Only because they could afford a family, a home and food to feed themselves. > The reason most of everything has gone overseas is regulation and taxes. Regulations and taxes that were passed by the ultra rich. The poor don't have access to the policy makers. > The Blue party has slid so far to the left they have passed socialism headed for the hammer and sickle. Again, the rich altering the country’s founding fathers. > A democrat of my youth would be considered a far right Republican today. There is nothing about either party that would be recognizable 100 years ago. Neither party represents the majority of Americans anymore. > I will pose a question when was the country and dollar stronger under more conservative principles 50 years ago or the liberal principles of today. Forget 50 years. Just ask that question since Reagan. > Just look how much our inter cities have improved and how cities like have grown with the socialism march like Detroit. Cheaper to send the jobs overseas for cheap laborer to benefit other countries. Ask a better question for clarification. Are “American Corporations” financially better off now or when they made things in America with far more local competition? Now they want to bring in their overseas billions without paying taxes or telling us where that money came from. Yet the individual is required to pay U.S. taxes on "world wide income" if we leave the states. > The list goes on and on the blue party has destroyed American's industrial power. Which party owns more of the corporations? The destruction of American's industrial power wasn’t distorted by the poorer party. It was destroyed by the rich passing laws and regulations that benefitted them over America. Well, that and owning the Supreme Court also helps. > They have used Gestapo like tactic's and march in lock step it is called the EPA. More accurately it is called the Tea Party. Again, it's not the poor that is polluting the water and air internationally. But I can see how you might disagree. > Never in my life time did I think would see a President of any party stop Americans from getting good paying jobs. That is funny. Where exactly are the jobs you claim someone is stopping us from accessing? I guess making up the facts is easier than researching the truth. The good paying jobs have been shipped out of the U.S. Partially because we have stopped educating our masses without cost. We've pared down our education so far that we learn only from books and not from hands on learning. What high schools still offer the classes we all were exposed to 50 years ago? Who is it that is profiting off the $100+ books required in colleges? > All part of the agenda to enslave And you really believe that the poor are enslaving the rich? I have to admit, that one surprised me. > And thus the journey as Mr Franklin predicted. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." And we have arrived. I hate to use facts and history to confuse you. But name a country that is "corrupt and vicious” that isn’t run by the “masters” you seem to love? Virtue does not have anything to do with those that run this country anymore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
I'm Racist ?????????
Top