Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
I have a question...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alice" data-source="post: 572997" data-attributes="member: 3873"><p>There's no good answer to this. Responsibility can't be legislated. Like Lammie says, children cannot be allowed to starve because their parents are irresponsible. Third World countries have children dying daily in the streets because of starvation and lack of health care for them, and I find that morally reprehensible, as do the majority of the people in the United States. </p><p></p><p>It's all well and good to say if you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em, and I definitely understand that sentiment. However, the children are here, and they must be fed, clothed, and sheltered. Personally, I would like to see all children that are born to irresponsible, immoral, parents taken immediately and placed where they will be raised properly. I would also like to see something along the lines of two strikes you're out...in other words, it wouldn't bother me a bit to take an irresponsible man/boy who's fathered a whole gaggle of kids by a whole gaggle of girlfriends and neuter him. Same with the women/girls who can't seem to understand what it takes to have kids. Now, Dun, there's a case for ACLU...</p><p></p><p>Alice</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alice, post: 572997, member: 3873"] There's no good answer to this. Responsibility can't be legislated. Like Lammie says, children cannot be allowed to starve because their parents are irresponsible. Third World countries have children dying daily in the streets because of starvation and lack of health care for them, and I find that morally reprehensible, as do the majority of the people in the United States. It's all well and good to say if you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em, and I definitely understand that sentiment. However, the children are here, and they must be fed, clothed, and sheltered. Personally, I would like to see all children that are born to irresponsible, immoral, parents taken immediately and placed where they will be raised properly. I would also like to see something along the lines of two strikes you're out...in other words, it wouldn't bother me a bit to take an irresponsible man/boy who's fathered a whole gaggle of kids by a whole gaggle of girlfriends and neuter him. Same with the women/girls who can't seem to understand what it takes to have kids. Now, Dun, there's a case for ACLU... Alice [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
I have a question...
Top