Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
Hydrgen peroxide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OxyBlast" data-source="post: 416654" data-attributes="member: 6319"><p>Hey SCRUBS620</p><p></p><p> I have posted several different articles refuting your claim that hydrogen peroxide is dangerous. It is not and these scientific article prove it. It is a necessary part of our human body. And it only attacks unhealthy cells not the healthy ones. Can you have an excessive amount of free radicals of course. There are different types of free radicals also. But that doesn't mean a conservative amount is dangerous. It is clearly not. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course the article proves something. It proves that hydrogen peroxide does NOT damage the healthy cells. It is that simple you obviously just dont want to see it when it is right there in the article. Plus the article I just posted above. Why did the cascade not happen in the healthy cells? The hydrogen peroxide was still there? According to your theory it should have destroyed the healthy cells also. BUT IT DIDNT! Same thing with the article above. Hydrogen peroxide, according to your theory, should have destroyed the egg BUT we see that it actually protected it! So this just proves your theories on hydrogen peroxide are flawed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> I know what a free radical is. And I have posted several different scientific articles to back up what I am saying. Free radicals are NOT dangerous and only attack unhealthy cells. What scientific articles or studies have you posted to refute the scientific articles I posted? </p><p></p><p></p><p> SCRUBS620 have a great day! I see you are from Indiana. We are located in Wayne county.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OxyBlast, post: 416654, member: 6319"] Hey SCRUBS620 I have posted several different articles refuting your claim that hydrogen peroxide is dangerous. It is not and these scientific article prove it. It is a necessary part of our human body. And it only attacks unhealthy cells not the healthy ones. Can you have an excessive amount of free radicals of course. There are different types of free radicals also. But that doesn't mean a conservative amount is dangerous. It is clearly not. Of course the article proves something. It proves that hydrogen peroxide does NOT damage the healthy cells. It is that simple you obviously just dont want to see it when it is right there in the article. Plus the article I just posted above. Why did the cascade not happen in the healthy cells? The hydrogen peroxide was still there? According to your theory it should have destroyed the healthy cells also. BUT IT DIDNT! Same thing with the article above. Hydrogen peroxide, according to your theory, should have destroyed the egg BUT we see that it actually protected it! So this just proves your theories on hydrogen peroxide are flawed. I know what a free radical is. And I have posted several different scientific articles to back up what I am saying. Free radicals are NOT dangerous and only attack unhealthy cells. What scientific articles or studies have you posted to refute the scientific articles I posted? SCRUBS620 have a great day! I see you are from Indiana. We are located in Wayne county. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
Hydrgen peroxide
Top