Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Feedyard Board
High fiber feed vs high energy feed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vclavin" data-source="post: 721206" data-attributes="member: 13613"><p>TexasBred,</p><p> Maybe you can help me with a question. How much difference would there be in the marbling scores, fat, etc, if I were to feed the high energy instead?</p><p></p><p>There are 3 animals I am curious about.</p><p>#15816019 DOB 1-27-07</p><p>weaning 644</p><p>yearling 817</p><p>Ultrasound: actual in quotes 433 days</p><p>weight 863 (910)</p><p>IMF 8.26 (8.53)</p><p>RE 9.5 (9.9)</p><p>Rib fat .30 (.32)</p><p>Rump Fat .37 (.39)</p><p>-------</p><p>Ultrasound again at 650 days (no adj made, just raw data)</p><p>weight 1044</p><p>IMF 9.01</p><p>RE 12.00</p><p>RIb Fat .24</p><p>Rump Fat .25</p><p></p><p>===================</p><p>#15816020</p><p>weaning 668</p><p>yearling 1071</p><p>Ultrasound - actual in quotes 414 days</p><p>weight 987 (1080)</p><p>IMF 7.65 (7.84)</p><p>RE 10.8 (11.4)</p><p>RIb Fat .14 (.20)</p><p>RUmp Fat .24 (.27)</p><p>------</p><p>Ultrasound again at 631 days raw data only (taken after breeding cows)</p><p>weight 1574</p><p>IMF 8.01</p><p>RE 14.3</p><p>Rib fat .27</p><p>Rump Fat .30</p><p>========================</p><p>#15816021</p><p>weaning 641</p><p>yearling 1059</p><p>Ultrasound - actual in quotes 380 days</p><p>weight 998 (1006)</p><p>IMF 5.69 (5.75)</p><p>RE 12.6 (12.7)</p><p>Rib FAt .36 (.36)</p><p>Rump Fat .37 (.37)</p><p>---------------</p><p>Ultrasound again at 582 days raw data only</p><p>weight 1598</p><p>IMF 5.55</p><p>RE 17.10</p><p>Rib Fat .35</p><p>Rump Fat .36</p><p>===================</p><p> Would you assume marbling would be greater but also the rib fat & rump fat if feed high energy feed? Even though the fat cover is very little, they does not seem to notice the cold.</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>Valerie Clavin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vclavin, post: 721206, member: 13613"] TexasBred, Maybe you can help me with a question. How much difference would there be in the marbling scores, fat, etc, if I were to feed the high energy instead? There are 3 animals I am curious about. #15816019 DOB 1-27-07 weaning 644 yearling 817 Ultrasound: actual in quotes 433 days weight 863 (910) IMF 8.26 (8.53) RE 9.5 (9.9) Rib fat .30 (.32) Rump Fat .37 (.39) ------- Ultrasound again at 650 days (no adj made, just raw data) weight 1044 IMF 9.01 RE 12.00 RIb Fat .24 Rump Fat .25 =================== #15816020 weaning 668 yearling 1071 Ultrasound - actual in quotes 414 days weight 987 (1080) IMF 7.65 (7.84) RE 10.8 (11.4) RIb Fat .14 (.20) RUmp Fat .24 (.27) ------ Ultrasound again at 631 days raw data only (taken after breeding cows) weight 1574 IMF 8.01 RE 14.3 Rib fat .27 Rump Fat .30 ======================== #15816021 weaning 641 yearling 1059 Ultrasound - actual in quotes 380 days weight 998 (1006) IMF 5.69 (5.75) RE 12.6 (12.7) Rib FAt .36 (.36) Rump Fat .37 (.37) --------------- Ultrasound again at 582 days raw data only weight 1598 IMF 5.55 RE 17.10 Rib Fat .35 Rump Fat .36 =================== Would you assume marbling would be greater but also the rib fat & rump fat if feed high energy feed? Even though the fat cover is very little, they does not seem to notice the cold. Thanks for your input. Valerie Clavin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Feedyard Board
High fiber feed vs high energy feed
Top