Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Genomics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Till-Hill" data-source="post: 1513953" data-attributes="member: 16547"><p>With that cow family I can see why you are getting the spreads. 2.3 on dam, 4 grand dam, 3.2 great, 3.8 great great.</p><p></p><p>Used Charlo -.4 bull and about 4 dams back there is like a 4.7 bw. I'm surprised you had that many lower ones with the birth weight averages there lower than breed averages.</p><p></p><p>The cow family as far back (4 generations) has only 32 calves reported with actual birth weights, with 15 coming from the dam of these calves. Would I assume a bunch are ET calves too?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Till-Hill, post: 1513953, member: 16547"] With that cow family I can see why you are getting the spreads. 2.3 on dam, 4 grand dam, 3.2 great, 3.8 great great. Used Charlo -.4 bull and about 4 dams back there is like a 4.7 bw. I'm surprised you had that many lower ones with the birth weight averages there lower than breed averages. The cow family as far back (4 generations) has only 32 calves reported with actual birth weights, with 15 coming from the dam of these calves. Would I assume a bunch are ET calves too? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Genomics
Top