Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
generic cydectin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lucky_P" data-source="post: 900228" data-attributes="member: 12607"><p>T.A. Yazwinski, et al. A Field Trial Evaluation of Several Commercial Ivermectin Pour-On Products in Cattle. </p><p>Arkansas Cattle Business.20(9):44-46, 2004.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/211850mp2h60x373/" target="_blank">http://www.springerlink.com/content/211850mp2h60x373/</a></p><p></p><p>Not sure 'who' funded the study, and I understand what you're hinting at. Even if it were funded by a company with a competing product, facts is facts and a properly-designed research protocol at a university has to pass examination by an IACUC for validity, and then pass peer-review for publication. If there were any attempt to monkey with the results/data by the funding entity, it shouldn't make it past those hurdles for publication.</p><p>I know, folks want to say, "Well, Ft. Dodge(or Merial, or Rhone-Poulenc, etc.) funded that study, so you can't really believe the results." It ain't necessarily so.</p><p></p><p>Dr. Yazwinski has a nice video on parasites in cattle - <a href="http://vimeo.com/11107393" target="_blank">http://vimeo.com/11107393</a> - I've not yet had a chance to sit through the whole thing, but it's only about a half-hour long. Starts talking about the generics around 19:30, then goes on to comparisons between specific wormers. Well worth watching.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lucky_P, post: 900228, member: 12607"] T.A. Yazwinski, et al. A Field Trial Evaluation of Several Commercial Ivermectin Pour-On Products in Cattle. Arkansas Cattle Business.20(9):44-46, 2004. [url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/211850mp2h60x373/]http://www.springerlink.com/content/211850mp2h60x373/[/url] Not sure 'who' funded the study, and I understand what you're hinting at. Even if it were funded by a company with a competing product, facts is facts and a properly-designed research protocol at a university has to pass examination by an IACUC for validity, and then pass peer-review for publication. If there were any attempt to monkey with the results/data by the funding entity, it shouldn't make it past those hurdles for publication. I know, folks want to say, "Well, Ft. Dodge(or Merial, or Rhone-Poulenc, etc.) funded that study, so you can't really believe the results." It ain't necessarily so. Dr. Yazwinski has a nice video on parasites in cattle - [url=http://vimeo.com/11107393]http://vimeo.com/11107393[/url] - I've not yet had a chance to sit through the whole thing, but it's only about a half-hour long. Starts talking about the generics around 19:30, then goes on to comparisons between specific wormers. Well worth watching. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
generic cydectin
Top