Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Gen. Robert E. Lee' s statute is coming down today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lee VanRoss" data-source="post: 1701671" data-attributes="member: 40072"><p>R E was given a choice as to which side to champion. Would he have been revered as much if he had chosen to defend the Union?</p><p>From a personal viewpoint I would like to say yes. The problem was that he saw the 'United States' as a group of countries which</p><p>can be attributed to King George III signing peace treaties with 13 separate STATES or countries if you will as all were treated as</p><p>separate entities at Versailles (sp). As of this moment I am unsure how many states have motions or bills before their legislature</p><p>proposing secession, none of which to my knowledge have any chance of passing. (<em>I have been trying for years to trade Detroit and</em></p><p><em>Elizabeth Warren for Alberta!) </em>Apparently he was of the opinion that Washington DC did not have the lawful authority to deny</p><p>a state legislature from voting for separation.. Some would agree...........</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lee VanRoss, post: 1701671, member: 40072"] R E was given a choice as to which side to champion. Would he have been revered as much if he had chosen to defend the Union? From a personal viewpoint I would like to say yes. The problem was that he saw the 'United States' as a group of countries which can be attributed to King George III signing peace treaties with 13 separate STATES or countries if you will as all were treated as separate entities at Versailles (sp). As of this moment I am unsure how many states have motions or bills before their legislature proposing secession, none of which to my knowledge have any chance of passing. ([I]I have been trying for years to trade Detroit and Elizabeth Warren for Alberta!) [/I]Apparently he was of the opinion that Washington DC did not have the lawful authority to deny a state legislature from voting for separation.. Some would agree........... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Gen. Robert E. Lee' s statute is coming down today
Top