Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Gelbvieh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UG" data-source="post: 1424688" data-attributes="member: 714"><p>I agree with the comments regarding the value of heterosis (hybrid vigor); especially maternal heterosis. However, it isn't always as simple to implement, especially in larger operations, as the "experts" would lead you to believe it is.</p><p></p><p>For example, a progressive cattle producer that I know runs 2200 cows. He wanted to maximize heterosis in his herd, and after much research (including reviewing data from MARC) decided approximately 15 years ago to run Angus/Gelbvieh cows and breed them to Charolais bulls. All of the calves would go to the feedlot. His first challenge was finding a reliable single source of Angus/Gelbvieh heifers every year. It wasn't a problem finding enough Angus/Gelbvieh heifers, but the challenge was finding enough of those heifers that fit his Iowa environment. Many of the heifers from the west and north didn't acclimate very well to the humidity, and challenges of tall fescue. He wasn't able to find a reliable source for that many heifers in states with comparable environmental conditions.</p><p></p><p>So, he decided to maintain a base herd of purebred Angus females to produce his own replacements. Part of the Angus females would be bred to Gelbvieh bulls, from which he would select his replacements for the main herd, and the balance of the Angus cows would be bred to Angus bulls to replenish the Angus herd. On paper this looked great. The problem was that some years he may get 65% bull calves, and not have enough Angus/Gelbvieh and/or Angus base herd replacement heifers. </p><p></p><p>Another challenge was that he didn't want to breed the first calf Angus/Gelbvieh heifers to Charolais bulls, to avoid calving problems, so these heifers were bred to calving ease Angus bulls. After all of this, he didn't have near as many Charolais sired high-growth calves to ship to the feedlot as he initially envisioned.</p><p></p><p>After several years of trying to maximize heterosis, he gave up. It was too time consuming trying to ensure that he had enough Angus and Angus/Gelbvieh replacement heifers. It was also a challenge having enough bulls of the right breeds to service the various segments; especially when he had 25+ breeding pastures. Another challenge was making sure that the employees were putting the right bulls with each set of cows and heifers. Eventually he recognized that he didn't have enough time to manage the breeding program as it required, and he transitioned to using hybrid bulls.</p><p></p><p>Someone posted earlier that one of the disadvantageous of using crossbred bulls is that there would be more variation in the calf crop. In my own experience I have not seen this. I also have not heard this comment from the many, many producers I know that utilize Simangus, Limflex, and Balancer bulls. I am sure that we would see more variability if seedstock producers were breeding 7.5 frame Simmental/Limousin/Gelbvieh bulls to 5 frame Angus/Red Angus cows, but for the most part I see seedstock producers breeding 5.5-6.5 frame bulls to 5.5-6.5 frame cows, resulting in a consistent product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UG, post: 1424688, member: 714"] I agree with the comments regarding the value of heterosis (hybrid vigor); especially maternal heterosis. However, it isn't always as simple to implement, especially in larger operations, as the "experts" would lead you to believe it is. For example, a progressive cattle producer that I know runs 2200 cows. He wanted to maximize heterosis in his herd, and after much research (including reviewing data from MARC) decided approximately 15 years ago to run Angus/Gelbvieh cows and breed them to Charolais bulls. All of the calves would go to the feedlot. His first challenge was finding a reliable single source of Angus/Gelbvieh heifers every year. It wasn't a problem finding enough Angus/Gelbvieh heifers, but the challenge was finding enough of those heifers that fit his Iowa environment. Many of the heifers from the west and north didn't acclimate very well to the humidity, and challenges of tall fescue. He wasn't able to find a reliable source for that many heifers in states with comparable environmental conditions. So, he decided to maintain a base herd of purebred Angus females to produce his own replacements. Part of the Angus females would be bred to Gelbvieh bulls, from which he would select his replacements for the main herd, and the balance of the Angus cows would be bred to Angus bulls to replenish the Angus herd. On paper this looked great. The problem was that some years he may get 65% bull calves, and not have enough Angus/Gelbvieh and/or Angus base herd replacement heifers. Another challenge was that he didn't want to breed the first calf Angus/Gelbvieh heifers to Charolais bulls, to avoid calving problems, so these heifers were bred to calving ease Angus bulls. After all of this, he didn't have near as many Charolais sired high-growth calves to ship to the feedlot as he initially envisioned. After several years of trying to maximize heterosis, he gave up. It was too time consuming trying to ensure that he had enough Angus and Angus/Gelbvieh replacement heifers. It was also a challenge having enough bulls of the right breeds to service the various segments; especially when he had 25+ breeding pastures. Another challenge was making sure that the employees were putting the right bulls with each set of cows and heifers. Eventually he recognized that he didn't have enough time to manage the breeding program as it required, and he transitioned to using hybrid bulls. Someone posted earlier that one of the disadvantageous of using crossbred bulls is that there would be more variation in the calf crop. In my own experience I have not seen this. I also have not heard this comment from the many, many producers I know that utilize Simangus, Limflex, and Balancer bulls. I am sure that we would see more variability if seedstock producers were breeding 7.5 frame Simmental/Limousin/Gelbvieh bulls to 5 frame Angus/Red Angus cows, but for the most part I see seedstock producers breeding 5.5-6.5 frame bulls to 5.5-6.5 frame cows, resulting in a consistent product. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Gelbvieh
Top