Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Embryo Calves
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cow pollinater" data-source="post: 957147" data-attributes="member: 14661"><p>I don't understand...</p><p>Why flush these two? I understand that you like older genetics but I don't understand going backwards to get there. These cows do very well epd-wise on maternal and $EN but everything else is pretty boring. I'd understand using old genetics to reduce size as I'm kind of doing that myself but the mature height and weight of these doesn't really do that either.</p><p>I understand AI to keep the genetics going, but why flush genetics that are not moving foreward?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cow pollinater, post: 957147, member: 14661"] I don't understand... Why flush these two? I understand that you like older genetics but I don't understand going backwards to get there. These cows do very well epd-wise on maternal and $EN but everything else is pretty boring. I'd understand using old genetics to reduce size as I'm kind of doing that myself but the mature height and weight of these doesn't really do that either. I understand AI to keep the genetics going, but why flush genetics that are not moving foreward? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Embryo Calves
Top