Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Double Muscling and Tenderness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankie" data-source="post: 135854" data-attributes="member: 13"><p>Of course it says less quality. Your article says:</p><p></p><p> "<em>Measures of fatness were significantly lower in the DM carcasses, including external and internal fat depots</em>."</p><p></p><p>Internal fat includes marbling. More marbling equals higher USDA quality grade. This article seems to stress yield grade, but quality grade is equally as important and it seems to ignore that. Tenderness has very little to do with quality or yield grades. I don't know of any packing grid that rewards tenderness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankie, post: 135854, member: 13"] Of course it says less quality. Your article says: "[i]Measures of fatness were significantly lower in the DM carcasses, including external and internal fat depots[/i]." Internal fat includes marbling. More marbling equals higher USDA quality grade. This article seems to stress yield grade, but quality grade is equally as important and it seems to ignore that. Tenderness has very little to do with quality or yield grades. I don't know of any packing grid that rewards tenderness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Double Muscling and Tenderness
Top