Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Didn't we just talk about this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigbluegrass" data-source="post: 1702792" data-attributes="member: 15537"><p>Are you referring to my statement that over 90% of the reported adverse affects were for COVID 19? Let me be clear: I am not saying that 90% of the people vaccinated with COVID 19 reported adverse affects! Not at all. What I am stating is that 90% of the reported adverse affects in the 2021 report from VAERS are from the Covid 19 shot. It doesn't really matter how you measure "adverse affects" since I assume it is similar for all vaccines. In the VAERS data, you will also see that it documents which shot was given, manufacture, lot number, dose, injection site, etc. It isn't like they just takes a call from anyone who wants to file a complaint and they report it. There is a bit more to it than that.</p><p></p><p>VAERS data is listed for the adverse affects to all vaccines, not just the COVID 19 shot. How do you explain the higher incidence of reported adverse affects for COVID 19? This is comparing the adverse affects of the COVID 19 shot to all other vaccinations given.</p><p></p><p>I was going to attach all of the data, but it is over 23,000 pages. I just took the first (roughly) 500 lines of the excel file and made it into a PDF. That is just 14 pages. Maybe some of you will see the same thing I did. I didn't see anything showing the neighbors dog got sick or anything like that, I have no idea where you would find that kind of information.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigbluegrass, post: 1702792, member: 15537"] Are you referring to my statement that over 90% of the reported adverse affects were for COVID 19? Let me be clear: I am not saying that 90% of the people vaccinated with COVID 19 reported adverse affects! Not at all. What I am stating is that 90% of the reported adverse affects in the 2021 report from VAERS are from the Covid 19 shot. It doesn't really matter how you measure "adverse affects" since I assume it is similar for all vaccines. In the VAERS data, you will also see that it documents which shot was given, manufacture, lot number, dose, injection site, etc. It isn't like they just takes a call from anyone who wants to file a complaint and they report it. There is a bit more to it than that. VAERS data is listed for the adverse affects to all vaccines, not just the COVID 19 shot. How do you explain the higher incidence of reported adverse affects for COVID 19? This is comparing the adverse affects of the COVID 19 shot to all other vaccinations given. I was going to attach all of the data, but it is over 23,000 pages. I just took the first (roughly) 500 lines of the excel file and made it into a PDF. That is just 14 pages. Maybe some of you will see the same thing I did. I didn't see anything showing the neighbors dog got sick or anything like that, I have no idea where you would find that kind of information. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Didn't we just talk about this?
Top