Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Democracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cattle Rack Rancher" data-source="post: 24071" data-attributes="member: 245"><p>I was talking to some friends of mine from the good ole US of A last night and we got talking about the democratic process. We have a theory that the politicians are not actually running our countries. We think it is the media using the politicians as pawns to promote their homosexual/socialist agenda. I was watching Sixty Minutes the other night and they paraded out this fellow who was supposedly Bush's right hand man at one time. Richard Clarke? Anyway, he was talking about how Bush was trying to attack Iraq and how he ignored the 911 threat. Oddly enough this fellow has a book out and he no longer works for the Bush administration. Sounds like a combination of sour grapes and greed to me. You don't suppose a fellow like that might make up a story just so it would get him rich seliing his book. Also, look at the timing. Bush is back leading in the polls again and the socialist media will do anything to try and stop him from getting back into power because that doesn't fit into their agenda. It is very difficult to get your message out when you are constantly being misquoted. Am I the only person that sees this. Is there not something that can be done to get fair reporting for both parties in this election? The whole message seems to be Kerry good, Bush bad. Its going to be tough to win an election that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cattle Rack Rancher, post: 24071, member: 245"] I was talking to some friends of mine from the good ole US of A last night and we got talking about the democratic process. We have a theory that the politicians are not actually running our countries. We think it is the media using the politicians as pawns to promote their homosexual/socialist agenda. I was watching Sixty Minutes the other night and they paraded out this fellow who was supposedly Bush's right hand man at one time. Richard Clarke? Anyway, he was talking about how Bush was trying to attack Iraq and how he ignored the 911 threat. Oddly enough this fellow has a book out and he no longer works for the Bush administration. Sounds like a combination of sour grapes and greed to me. You don't suppose a fellow like that might make up a story just so it would get him rich seliing his book. Also, look at the timing. Bush is back leading in the polls again and the socialist media will do anything to try and stop him from getting back into power because that doesn't fit into their agenda. It is very difficult to get your message out when you are constantly being misquoted. Am I the only person that sees this. Is there not something that can be done to get fair reporting for both parties in this election? The whole message seems to be Kerry good, Bush bad. Its going to be tough to win an election that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Democracy
Top