Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Dam of 878 / foresight CAC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Angus In Texas" data-source="post: 794455" data-attributes="member: 5611"><p>Would be about like the AM and NH carriers descending from 1680. I would venture to say it wouldn't be as wide spread. 878 and Foresight have made a big impact on the breed but 1680 was born 20 years ago and is found in a lot of the performance pedigrees today. 878 was born 8 years later and is found, in my opinion, in herds that focus on maternal, functional cattle that don't want to sacrifice performance. I would venture to say that due to embryo transfer being adopted by performance breeders sooner than functional breeders, that 1680 has a larger population of offspring and descendants.</p><p></p><p>Doesn't really matter what the fallout would have been since they have both tested negative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Angus In Texas, post: 794455, member: 5611"] Would be about like the AM and NH carriers descending from 1680. I would venture to say it wouldn't be as wide spread. 878 and Foresight have made a big impact on the breed but 1680 was born 20 years ago and is found in a lot of the performance pedigrees today. 878 was born 8 years later and is found, in my opinion, in herds that focus on maternal, functional cattle that don't want to sacrifice performance. I would venture to say that due to embryo transfer being adopted by performance breeders sooner than functional breeders, that 1680 has a larger population of offspring and descendants. Doesn't really matter what the fallout would have been since they have both tested negative. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Dam of 878 / foresight CAC
Top