Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Covid - good news
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RDFF" data-source="post: 1676831" data-attributes="member: 39018"><p>For those who think that the vaccines are the cure-all, even CNN is reporting "otherwise".</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/many-millions-have-been-vaccinated-against-the-coronavirus-396-were-later-hospitalized-with-covid-19/ar-BB1fFe7c?ocid=msedgntp[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Positive testing runs about 10% of the TESTED population... symptomatic runs less than 1% of the population, hospitalization runs much less than that, and death is much less than that.</p><p></p><p>77 million fully vaccinated in U.S.... but how many have/had been vaccinated LONG ENOUGH to have "protection" from the virus, at the time they contracted it (were actually tested positive), and were reported in this as "infected"? And what does "infected" mean? I will assume... but don't know of course, that the only reason that they even would have gone in to find out if they had "Covid" would be if they were symptomatic. 5800 reported symptomatic cases then, out of "how many??" that SHOULD have had vaccine protection by the time they became infected and were symptomatic? And of these 5800, 396 or 7% -- of those who got infected after they were vaccinated had symptoms bad enough to require hospitalization, and 74 died.</p><p></p><p>The "vaccines" don't (and never claim to) actually <u>prevent</u> you from becoming "infected" if you are exposed (meaning that you can't catch it and test "positive"), they don't prevent you from becoming symptomatic if you do "catch it" (but they <u>MAY</u> reduce the likelihood of becoming symptomatic slightly), they don't prevent you from having to be hospitalized if you do become symptomatic (but they <u>MAY</u> reduce the severity of your symptoms...), they don't (and never claim to) prevent you from carrying the virus on your person and "transmitting it" to others.... </p><p></p><p>So... how long before we'll "get back to normal"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RDFF, post: 1676831, member: 39018"] For those who think that the vaccines are the cure-all, even CNN is reporting "otherwise". [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/many-millions-have-been-vaccinated-against-the-coronavirus-396-were-later-hospitalized-with-covid-19/ar-BB1fFe7c?ocid=msedgntp[/URL] Positive testing runs about 10% of the TESTED population... symptomatic runs less than 1% of the population, hospitalization runs much less than that, and death is much less than that. 77 million fully vaccinated in U.S.... but how many have/had been vaccinated LONG ENOUGH to have "protection" from the virus, at the time they contracted it (were actually tested positive), and were reported in this as "infected"? And what does "infected" mean? I will assume... but don't know of course, that the only reason that they even would have gone in to find out if they had "Covid" would be if they were symptomatic. 5800 reported symptomatic cases then, out of "how many??" that SHOULD have had vaccine protection by the time they became infected and were symptomatic? And of these 5800, 396 or 7% -- of those who got infected after they were vaccinated had symptoms bad enough to require hospitalization, and 74 died. The "vaccines" don't (and never claim to) actually [U]prevent[/U] you from becoming "infected" if you are exposed (meaning that you can't catch it and test "positive"), they don't prevent you from becoming symptomatic if you do "catch it" (but they [U]MAY[/U] reduce the likelihood of becoming symptomatic slightly), they don't prevent you from having to be hospitalized if you do become symptomatic (but they [U]MAY[/U] reduce the severity of your symptoms...), they don't (and never claim to) prevent you from carrying the virus on your person and "transmitting it" to others.... So... how long before we'll "get back to normal"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Covid - good news
Top