Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Carcass, DNA, Ultrasound - better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vclavin" data-source="post: 721028" data-attributes="member: 13613"><p>I am beginning to think that carcass data is not really any better than ultrasound. Why? Both can be controlled by environment. As they say, you can't make an animal perform if he/she doesn't have the genetics for it.</p><p> Therefor, maybe DNA is our starting point to let us know "How" to aid an animal in reaching it's true potential.</p><p></p><p>Your thoughts?</p><p></p><p>Blessings</p><p>Valerie Clavin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vclavin, post: 721028, member: 13613"] I am beginning to think that carcass data is not really any better than ultrasound. Why? Both can be controlled by environment. As they say, you can't make an animal perform if he/she doesn't have the genetics for it. Therefor, maybe DNA is our starting point to let us know "How" to aid an animal in reaching it's true potential. Your thoughts? Blessings Valerie Clavin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Carcass, DNA, Ultrasound - better?
Top