Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Bull prospect
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rmc" data-source="post: 1808098" data-attributes="member: 39072"><p>Directly for the article from University of Missouri I posted earlier</p><p>[ATTACH=full]31294[/ATTACH]</p><p>Sorry that the science and research and documentation I have linked here wich back up my statements seem to be a little above you abilities or willingness to read and comprehend. The proof is in the links provided.</p><p> Blue eyes have been linked through genetics to a single individual 7-10,000 years ago. All descendants identified had the H-1haplotype.</p><p>Also had the same set of 13 snp mutations on chromosome 15.</p><p> All who process the blue eyed mutation</p><p>Are closer related to each other than the mean degree of relatedness to the population as a whole. There for any mating of two blue eyed individuals is a mating of closer related individuals then the population mean degree of relatedness. There for it is linebreeding.</p><p>Very simple basic science. Matings that are closer than mean degree of relatedness of the entire population are line breeding or inbreeding.</p><p>Matings of two individuals with a degree of relatedness less than the mean of the entire population is outcross.</p><p>As I have said before and will say again . Don't let scientific facts and research get in the way of your opinion.</p><p>Bury you head in the sand and ignore the science and research placed right in front of you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rmc, post: 1808098, member: 39072"] Directly for the article from University of Missouri I posted earlier [ATTACH type="full" alt="1686883268056.jpeg"]31294[/ATTACH] Sorry that the science and research and documentation I have linked here wich back up my statements seem to be a little above you abilities or willingness to read and comprehend. The proof is in the links provided. Blue eyes have been linked through genetics to a single individual 7-10,000 years ago. All descendants identified had the H-1haplotype. Also had the same set of 13 snp mutations on chromosome 15. All who process the blue eyed mutation Are closer related to each other than the mean degree of relatedness to the population as a whole. There for any mating of two blue eyed individuals is a mating of closer related individuals then the population mean degree of relatedness. There for it is linebreeding. Very simple basic science. Matings that are closer than mean degree of relatedness of the entire population are line breeding or inbreeding. Matings of two individuals with a degree of relatedness less than the mean of the entire population is outcross. As I have said before and will say again . Don’t let scientific facts and research get in the way of your opinion. Bury you head in the sand and ignore the science and research placed right in front of you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Bull prospect
Top