Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Buck with canine teeth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J Hoy" data-source="post: 1785702" data-attributes="member: 16398"><p>The severe underbite on this white-tailed deer fetus should be obvious to everyone. Since the fetus had one of the external birth defects that were found to be caused by exposure to the insecticide, imidacloprid, it likely had internal malformations, which caused it to die and be aborted. It also appears to have shorter than normal legs. This is the study that showed what imidacloprid does to exposed fetuses and adult does. (E. H. Berheim, et al. "Effects of Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Physology and Reproductive Characteristics of Captive Female and Fawn White-tailed Deer, March 14, 2019.) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40994-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40994-9</a></p><p>In large or small groups of wild and domestic grazing animals, including equines, examined for birth defects there was a fairly high prevalence of underbite in those born beginning in spring of 1995, the year after the first use of imidacloprid in 1994. Prior to 1995, underbite on grazing animals was extremely rare and had only been reported on 2 newborn white-tailed deer in scientific literature. In a study of 36 thousand hunter-killed white-tailed deer examined in Michigan in the 1960s, not one was found to have an underbite, which was one of the birth defects the study was looking for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J Hoy, post: 1785702, member: 16398"] The severe underbite on this white-tailed deer fetus should be obvious to everyone. Since the fetus had one of the external birth defects that were found to be caused by exposure to the insecticide, imidacloprid, it likely had internal malformations, which caused it to die and be aborted. It also appears to have shorter than normal legs. This is the study that showed what imidacloprid does to exposed fetuses and adult does. (E. H. Berheim, et al. "Effects of Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Physology and Reproductive Characteristics of Captive Female and Fawn White-tailed Deer, March 14, 2019.) [URL]https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40994-9[/URL] In large or small groups of wild and domestic grazing animals, including equines, examined for birth defects there was a fairly high prevalence of underbite in those born beginning in spring of 1995, the year after the first use of imidacloprid in 1994. Prior to 1995, underbite on grazing animals was extremely rare and had only been reported on 2 newborn white-tailed deer in scientific literature. In a study of 36 thousand hunter-killed white-tailed deer examined in Michigan in the 1960s, not one was found to have an underbite, which was one of the birth defects the study was looking for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
Buck with canine teeth
Top