Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
Brucellosis Program
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldtimer" data-source="post: 383025" data-attributes="member: 97"><p><strong>I don't know where the Gov gets his insight that the buffalo or elk at Yellowstone probably didn't play a part...Last time I was thru there, Emigrant was just north of the park- and that whole Paradise Valley was a travel way for Yellowstone wildlife :roll: </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>But this sure shows why we need to keep on USDA's rear and keep them from dropping the ball on the Brucellosis program- and why the cattlemens groups have been so up in arms about their plans to drop it... </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>USDA keeps saying they will not need it with their magic "mandatory ID" plan... </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Maybe they better go tag a bunch of those buffalo and elk of theirs if its the magic cure...</strong> ;-) </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>State's brucellosis-free status at risk </strong></p><p>Infection traced to Bridger herd; if next test is positive, state faces long recovery </p><p>By JAN FALSTAD </p><p>Of The Gazette Staff </p><p></p><p>Seven Montana cows have tested positive for brucellosis, and if at least two cows from a separate herd near Emigrant test positive next week, Montana will lose its brucellosis-free status. </p><p></p><p>That means Montana ranchers would have to pay to test all adult cattle being shipped out of state until Montana can regain its brucellosis-free status. </p><p></p><p>Gov. Brian Schweitzer said he expects the second set of tests results as early as Tuesday. </p><p></p><p>"There is a process you go through - rounding up cattle, drawing blood, testing it and then it's either 'Whew!' or 'Oh, my God,' " Schweitzer said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is in charge of controlling the disease. APHIS rules say that a state loses its brucellosis-free status when at least two cows from two herds test positive within 12 months. </p><p></p><p>On May 1, 51 Angus cows bound for Iowa were tested for brucellosis in Baker. Because Montana is a brucellosis-free state, the cows wouldn't normally be tested. But because the cows were going to be surrogate mothers, the tests were conducted. </p><p></p><p>On May 4, the Montana State Lab in Bozeman found that one cow tested positive for brucellosis. That cow was euthanized and tissue cultures were re-tested at the National Veterinary Services lab in Ames, Iowa, which conducts the testing for APHIS. </p><p></p><p>The infected cow was traced back to a herd of 301 cows in Bridger, and that herd was quarantined after six more cows tested positive for brucellosis. </p><p></p><p>Brucellosis is a contagious disease in ruminant animals that can cause fetuses to abort. </p><p></p><p><strong>The Bridger cattle came from a ranch near Emigrant, Schweitzer said. A second herd in the Paradise Valley is being tested now. </strong></p><p></p><p>To prevent the spread of brucellosis from bison to area cattle, officials from the Montana Department of Livestock have hazed wandering Yellowstone National Park bison back into the park. Last year, more than 1,000 bison that ranged onto private lands in Montana were captured, and most were sent to slaughter. </p><p></p><p>However, the governor said information he has received indicates that bison aren't to blame. </p><p></p><p>"It seems almost impossible this was a direct transmission from Yellowstone bison to cattle. It could have been it came from elk," Schweitzer said. "Or it could have been someone shipping cattle into Montana from some infected herd in Texas or Mexico." </p><p></p><p>Jeremy Seidlitz, executive director of the Montana Cattlemen's Association, expressed concern but said he feels helpless for now. </p><p></p><p>"I really don't think there is anything we can do but watch and hope," Seidlitz said. "Losing the brucellosis-free status is very expensive in terms of money and time." </p><p></p><p>Brucellosis is considered one of the most serious livestock diseases, primarily affecting cattle, swine, bison and elk. </p><p></p><p>Ranchers, veterinarians and workers in slaughterhouses are most at risk for the human strain, called undulant fever. </p><p></p><p>Montana has been brucellosis-free since June 1985. Wyoming found brucellosis in its cattle in 2004 and regained its brucellosis-free status last September. </p><p></p><p>Currently, Idaho and Texas are the only states without a brucellosis-free rating. </p><p></p><p>Testing costs from $5 to $10 per animal, depending on whether the tests are conducted at the ranch or elsewhere, said Ray Randall, who owns Bridger Veterinary Service. </p><p></p><p>"It's a significant problem," he said. "The last time I remember having a brucellosis-positive herd was in the '70s." </p><p></p><p>Randall said he hasn't taken any blood tests for brucellosis yet. </p><p></p><p>Even if the second herd tests free of the disease, the 301 cows quarantined near Bridger must be slaughtered, according to APHIS rules. There is no immediate financial help for the owner. </p><p></p><p>Indemnity funds exist for ranchers who lose livestock to wolves, but not this disease, Seidlitz said, adding that he's never heard of brucellosis insurance. </p><p></p><p>Schweitzer said the bad news is reason to adopt his plan to test all cattle within a ring around Yellowstone National Park. </p><p></p><p>He has proposed to APHIS that Montana be allowed to mark off an area of 60 to 70 miles around Yellowstone National Park and require that all the cattle moving in and out of the zone be tested. If the disease shows up, only that zone would lose its brucellosis-free status, not the whole state. </p><p></p><p>"We would have caught it at its source," the governor said. "Now we're in a position where people long removed from Yellowstone Basin are being painted with the same brush." </p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, APHIS spokeswoman Teresa Howes in Fort Collins, Colo., said tracing back and testing cattle is a long process, one that's just starting in Montana. </p><p></p><p>"The good news is that this was found and it didn't go on to infect the national herd," she said. "Now we're doing the investigation to make sure no other herds are infected." </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/05/19/news/state/20-brucellosis.txt" target="_blank">http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... llosis.txt</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldtimer, post: 383025, member: 97"] [b]I don't know where the Gov gets his insight that the buffalo or elk at Yellowstone probably didn't play a part...Last time I was thru there, Emigrant was just north of the park- and that whole Paradise Valley was a travel way for Yellowstone wildlife :roll: But this sure shows why we need to keep on USDA's rear and keep them from dropping the ball on the Brucellosis program- and why the cattlemens groups have been so up in arms about their plans to drop it... USDA keeps saying they will not need it with their magic "mandatory ID" plan... Maybe they better go tag a bunch of those buffalo and elk of theirs if its the magic cure...[/b] ;-) [b]State's brucellosis-free status at risk [/b] Infection traced to Bridger herd; if next test is positive, state faces long recovery By JAN FALSTAD Of The Gazette Staff Seven Montana cows have tested positive for brucellosis, and if at least two cows from a separate herd near Emigrant test positive next week, Montana will lose its brucellosis-free status. That means Montana ranchers would have to pay to test all adult cattle being shipped out of state until Montana can regain its brucellosis-free status. Gov. Brian Schweitzer said he expects the second set of tests results as early as Tuesday. "There is a process you go through - rounding up cattle, drawing blood, testing it and then it's either 'Whew!' or 'Oh, my God,' " Schweitzer said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is in charge of controlling the disease. APHIS rules say that a state loses its brucellosis-free status when at least two cows from two herds test positive within 12 months. On May 1, 51 Angus cows bound for Iowa were tested for brucellosis in Baker. Because Montana is a brucellosis-free state, the cows wouldn't normally be tested. But because the cows were going to be surrogate mothers, the tests were conducted. On May 4, the Montana State Lab in Bozeman found that one cow tested positive for brucellosis. That cow was euthanized and tissue cultures were re-tested at the National Veterinary Services lab in Ames, Iowa, which conducts the testing for APHIS. The infected cow was traced back to a herd of 301 cows in Bridger, and that herd was quarantined after six more cows tested positive for brucellosis. Brucellosis is a contagious disease in ruminant animals that can cause fetuses to abort. [b]The Bridger cattle came from a ranch near Emigrant, Schweitzer said. A second herd in the Paradise Valley is being tested now. [/b] To prevent the spread of brucellosis from bison to area cattle, officials from the Montana Department of Livestock have hazed wandering Yellowstone National Park bison back into the park. Last year, more than 1,000 bison that ranged onto private lands in Montana were captured, and most were sent to slaughter. However, the governor said information he has received indicates that bison aren't to blame. "It seems almost impossible this was a direct transmission from Yellowstone bison to cattle. It could have been it came from elk," Schweitzer said. "Or it could have been someone shipping cattle into Montana from some infected herd in Texas or Mexico." Jeremy Seidlitz, executive director of the Montana Cattlemen's Association, expressed concern but said he feels helpless for now. "I really don't think there is anything we can do but watch and hope," Seidlitz said. "Losing the brucellosis-free status is very expensive in terms of money and time." Brucellosis is considered one of the most serious livestock diseases, primarily affecting cattle, swine, bison and elk. Ranchers, veterinarians and workers in slaughterhouses are most at risk for the human strain, called undulant fever. Montana has been brucellosis-free since June 1985. Wyoming found brucellosis in its cattle in 2004 and regained its brucellosis-free status last September. Currently, Idaho and Texas are the only states without a brucellosis-free rating. Testing costs from $5 to $10 per animal, depending on whether the tests are conducted at the ranch or elsewhere, said Ray Randall, who owns Bridger Veterinary Service. "It's a significant problem," he said. "The last time I remember having a brucellosis-positive herd was in the '70s." Randall said he hasn't taken any blood tests for brucellosis yet. Even if the second herd tests free of the disease, the 301 cows quarantined near Bridger must be slaughtered, according to APHIS rules. There is no immediate financial help for the owner. Indemnity funds exist for ranchers who lose livestock to wolves, but not this disease, Seidlitz said, adding that he's never heard of brucellosis insurance. Schweitzer said the bad news is reason to adopt his plan to test all cattle within a ring around Yellowstone National Park. He has proposed to APHIS that Montana be allowed to mark off an area of 60 to 70 miles around Yellowstone National Park and require that all the cattle moving in and out of the zone be tested. If the disease shows up, only that zone would lose its brucellosis-free status, not the whole state. "We would have caught it at its source," the governor said. "Now we're in a position where people long removed from Yellowstone Basin are being painted with the same brush." Meanwhile, APHIS spokeswoman Teresa Howes in Fort Collins, Colo., said tracing back and testing cattle is a long process, one that's just starting in Montana. "The good news is that this was found and it didn't go on to infect the national herd," she said. "Now we're doing the investigation to make sure no other herds are infected." [url=http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/05/19/news/state/20-brucellosis.txt]http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... llosis.txt[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Health & Nutrition
Brucellosis Program
Top