Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Between a ROCK and a HARD SPOT!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DOC HARRIS" data-source="post: 490147" data-attributes="member: 1683"><p>Every year, with the Ides of January upon us, most serious beef breeders are inundated with a myriad of publications, sale brochures, catalogs, Breed magazines and the like, from Purebred Beef Breeders, espousing the 'so-called' virtues of their breeding efforts, and touting the superiority of their seedstock - citing the EPD's relating to Growth and Carcass Values, etc. All of this is as it should be. In what other manner are breeder's, who are seeking information relating to seedstock traits and characteristics, going to discover what is available for their perusal? </p><p></p><p>However - at this juncture, the subject of "Cow Size" raises it's head from the feed trough, fixes it's gaze on the sack of Supplement and the Mineral tub, and say's "Pour it to me!" There have been discussions on this topic in the past, with seemingly little or no decisive conclusions substantiated or confirmed by the members of this Forum. </p><p></p><p>I have read some eye-popping statistics recently from several well-known seedstock producers of long standing and high reputation claiming Weaning Weight EPD's in the 60's and higher, Yearling Weight EPD's well over 100 pounds, and Actual 205 day weights crowding 900 lbs. and Yearling Weights over 1500 pounds! (These are Angus, by the way). <strong>HELLO!</strong> What does this say about our national cow herd getting too big?!</p><p></p><p>Perhaps we can get some experienced breeder's to voice their opinions regarding how much more it costs to maintain a 1400 lb cow vs. an 1150 lb cow in feed cost per year, hay, labor in forage production, taxes, etc. It strikes me that this continuing increase in the size of our breeding stock, in SPITE of the old argument that ". . .after all, we ARE selling pounds" . . . is a formula for big problems in the future.</p><p></p><p>I think the <em>PRODUCERS</em> must decide what markets they are pandering to - the Terminal Feedlot Owners, or the local Meat Markets, who continue to complain that the slaughtered meat cuts that they receive are too big for the housewives who are not feeding families with six and seven people around the dinner table any more, but are "going out" to eat! A RIBEYE of 17.+ inches is a pretty big chunk of meat for two or three people to get around after they have paid BIG bucks for it!</p><p></p><p>I think it is time for us to determine whether we are going to go for the "ROCK" or the "HARD SPOT", and what our Replacement Heifers are beginning to produce in the future! Bigger and Bigger is not necessarily Better and Better!</p><p></p><p>What say you?</p><p></p><p>DOC HARRIS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DOC HARRIS, post: 490147, member: 1683"] Every year, with the Ides of January upon us, most serious beef breeders are inundated with a myriad of publications, sale brochures, catalogs, Breed magazines and the like, from Purebred Beef Breeders, espousing the 'so-called' virtues of their breeding efforts, and touting the superiority of their seedstock - citing the EPD's relating to Growth and Carcass Values, etc. All of this is as it should be. In what other manner are breeder's, who are seeking information relating to seedstock traits and characteristics, going to discover what is available for their perusal? However - at this juncture, the subject of "Cow Size" raises it's head from the feed trough, fixes it's gaze on the sack of Supplement and the Mineral tub, and say's "Pour it to me!" There have been discussions on this topic in the past, with seemingly little or no decisive conclusions substantiated or confirmed by the members of this Forum. I have read some eye-popping statistics recently from several well-known seedstock producers of long standing and high reputation claiming Weaning Weight EPD's in the 60's and higher, Yearling Weight EPD's well over 100 pounds, and Actual 205 day weights crowding 900 lbs. and Yearling Weights over 1500 pounds! (These are Angus, by the way). [b]HELLO![/b] What does this say about our national cow herd getting too big?! Perhaps we can get some experienced breeder's to voice their opinions regarding how much more it costs to maintain a 1400 lb cow vs. an 1150 lb cow in feed cost per year, hay, labor in forage production, taxes, etc. It strikes me that this continuing increase in the size of our breeding stock, in SPITE of the old argument that ". . .after all, we ARE selling pounds" . . . is a formula for big problems in the future. I think the [i]PRODUCERS[/i] must decide what markets they are pandering to - the Terminal Feedlot Owners, or the local Meat Markets, who continue to complain that the slaughtered meat cuts that they receive are too big for the housewives who are not feeding families with six and seven people around the dinner table any more, but are "going out" to eat! A RIBEYE of 17.+ inches is a pretty big chunk of meat for two or three people to get around after they have paid BIG bucks for it! I think it is time for us to determine whether we are going to go for the "ROCK" or the "HARD SPOT", and what our Replacement Heifers are beginning to produce in the future! Bigger and Bigger is not necessarily Better and Better! What say you? DOC HARRIS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Between a ROCK and a HARD SPOT!
Top