dcara
Well-known member
I'll play the devils advocate here. BTW - I am not a banker (but try to tell the kids that who often refer to me as the Bank of Dad)
First, buying land almost always requires a 15% or more downpayment. If you have a lender that is not requireing that downpayment then they are going to want something else to ensure that you have a vested interest in the deal (i.e. more collateral). The land itself is not really collateral since if you walked away from it you haven't really lost anything other than the payments you made which were really nothing more than interest on money that you were using anyway. The last thing a financial institution wants is having to go through all the legal costs to forclose on property that they then have to market and deal with themselves. They are in the business of investing money and anything else is a pain in the a$$ that they would prefer not to deal with. As far as the actual numbers go, $100k interest on a $100k loan for 30 years works out to a 5.375% interest rate. That is not a bad interest rate at all for raw land. I know thats not the actual deal but the end numbers are equavelant enough for comparison. In your deal the bank is trying to get enough cash plus collateral out of you up front to get you "vested" in the deal.
The point here is that the bank wants to be certain that you will do everything in your power to complete the deal. Since it would be very unusual for a bank not to require a down payment it seems to me that they are willing to work with you to make this deal happen. So maybe you can offer a counter proposal.
If you can indeed afford the 17k/yr for 5 years then as someone else mentioned earlier just do a straight 8 yr amortization at 5.375% and it would be paid for. The longer the term of the note, the higher the interest rate generally is. So here you are offering them their long term interrest rate (which seems low to me, especially for a bank) on a short term loan. For additional collateral you could offer the livestock. In the worst case, if you couldn't pay for the land due to some personal disaster then you wouldn't have to worry about finding a place for the livestock.
First, buying land almost always requires a 15% or more downpayment. If you have a lender that is not requireing that downpayment then they are going to want something else to ensure that you have a vested interest in the deal (i.e. more collateral). The land itself is not really collateral since if you walked away from it you haven't really lost anything other than the payments you made which were really nothing more than interest on money that you were using anyway. The last thing a financial institution wants is having to go through all the legal costs to forclose on property that they then have to market and deal with themselves. They are in the business of investing money and anything else is a pain in the a$$ that they would prefer not to deal with. As far as the actual numbers go, $100k interest on a $100k loan for 30 years works out to a 5.375% interest rate. That is not a bad interest rate at all for raw land. I know thats not the actual deal but the end numbers are equavelant enough for comparison. In your deal the bank is trying to get enough cash plus collateral out of you up front to get you "vested" in the deal.
The point here is that the bank wants to be certain that you will do everything in your power to complete the deal. Since it would be very unusual for a bank not to require a down payment it seems to me that they are willing to work with you to make this deal happen. So maybe you can offer a counter proposal.
If you can indeed afford the 17k/yr for 5 years then as someone else mentioned earlier just do a straight 8 yr amortization at 5.375% and it would be paid for. The longer the term of the note, the higher the interest rate generally is. So here you are offering them their long term interrest rate (which seems low to me, especially for a bank) on a short term loan. For additional collateral you could offer the livestock. In the worst case, if you couldn't pay for the land due to some personal disaster then you wouldn't have to worry about finding a place for the livestock.