Search results for query: *

Lord grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. -- Saint Francis of Assisi :) :lol:

MikeC RELAX!!! I never questioned The Hays' integrity, only the process. I didnt mean to ruffle any feathers. I wish you would read all of my comments and not read more into it. I think everyone should use the ultrasound technology available, no matter what lab they choose. And if we are...

Understood.... but again I will try to clearly state the following: in dealing with anything scientific you must try and remove ANY variables...this includes even a possible variable. While I am sure this isnt even a problem, it should be very easy to eliminate the possibilities from ever...

it is my understanding that the cuplab does not allow any approved techs to interpret as well as not allowing any interpreters to collect and submit images. That is clearly not the case with this other lab, just seems a little sketchy to me....that being said, I am sure everything is on the up...

so let me get this straight.....they are field techs and interpreters? Doesnt that defeat the whole purpose of having data collected and processed without bias? This was the only EPD that was based soley on science, I have my concerns. I'll stick with the CUPLAB for integrity. On a positive...