SF
Well-known member
Good post Ryan.
SF":6hv79jq1 said:Good post Ryan.
Chuckie":g90a3efu said:glover36, I meant to tell you, that is a good lookin' bull if that is the one you are going to use.
mtnman":hkp3y4hx said:It's obvious that some of you just sit around wiating for someone to drop an answer in your lap.
Black Herefords come from Hereford and Black Angus, with both parents being registered, moreso integitry than any other upbreeding program to data in the US. There was no other type of program that required both parents to be registered in their own breeds all through the 60's, 70's etc when the Continentals were upgrading. With that in mind, then the Black Herefords have a more detailed pedigree structure than any of the other breeds that have purebred vs fullblood classification. In essense the Hereford is a fullblood, and the Black Hereford is a purebred, just like purebred Simmie vs Fullblood Simmie, etc, or anything else.
That simple, nothing more. It is readily available on websites if you bother to look, rather than sitting here whining about it.
mtnman
Ryan":1ngrhulh said:be black in color, and must be sired by a bull registered in the ABHA.
Bez":1ngrhulh said:And none will ever be registered by the American Herf Assoc, Canadian Herf Assoc, British Herf Assoc, Aus Herf Assoc or the World Herf Congress. Because they are not Herfs. They are cross bred / bred up animals. Call them what you will, this is not a Herf. The name is a marketing ploy and the registration is a false marketing ploy. Herf Assoc's do not allow or recognize this. Period.
Bez
mtnman":2y54wdsv said:It's obvious that some of you just sit around wiating for someone to drop an answer in your lap.
Black Herefords come from Hereford and Black Angus, with both parents being registered, moreso integitry than any other upbreeding program to data in the US. There was no other type of program that required both parents to be registered in their own breeds all through the 60's, 70's etc when the Continentals were upgrading. With that in mind, then the Black Herefords have a more detailed pedigree structure than any of the other breeds that have purebred vs fullblood classification. In essense the Hereford is a fullblood, and the Black Hereford is a purebred, just like purebred Simmie vs Fullblood Simmie, etc, or anything else.
That simple, nothing more. It is readily available on websites if you bother to look, rather than sitting here whining about it.
mtnman
Fred Kloppenburg":3klsiuqo said:my gradpa raised herefords in the fifties and every once in a while a blackone would pop up no neibors with black bulls they looked just like the rest of the herd but the red was black they were horned herefords he gave me on when i was young
The origins of a special breed of cattle in the County of Herefordshire have been mentioned by various agricultural authors as long ago as the early 1600's.During the 1700's and early 1800's documented records of the breed were maintained by various individuals in and around the Herefordshire area, leading to the publication of the First Herd Book of Hereford Cattle in 1846 by Thomas Eyton of Wellington, Shropshire. This First Herd Book contained the records of 551 Bulls entered by 75 Breeders.
SF":1dn3ihji said:MikeC":1dn3ihji said:SF":1dn3ihji said:glover36":1dn3ihji said:http://www.blackhereford.com/article.html
theres webstie that breeds balck herefords
I've seen the web site. What is the lineage of Black Herefords? Where did the black hide come from? Why did AHA not recognize them?
These are simple questions. How did registered Hereford cattle ever produce a black hided Hereford? If so, show me the lineage. I'm not a believer yet. I think that Black Herefords are crossbred animals. AHA wouldn't recognize them, so they created their own registry. JMO
I don't really understand the argument here. It's a given that every breed on this planet were at some point in time crossbred to get the final result. Whether it was last week or 200 years ago makes little difference to me.
I don't think we should discourage anyone for developing new breeds that might be beneficial to the beef industry in the long term.
If someone wanted an ALL ORIGINAL BREED, he might have to go back to the water buffalo or yak.
No one is arguing your point here Mike. Hereford cattle have been around for more than 200 years. Hereford cattle are not black, nor ever have been (to my knowledge). There is not any genetic disposition in hereford cattle that will produce a hereford with black hair and/or a black hide. Therefore in order to get a "black hereford", you must cross with something. Why not tell us what it is. The modern day brahma was developed through crossbreeding, so was Santa Gertrudis, Braford, etc... Have no objection to the creation of a new breed. Simply asked the question of how, what is the bloodline. The only response I've ever received is that they are purebred Herefords with a recessed black gene. To my knowledge this is false and misinformation.
Chuckie, before making these kinda statements maybe you oughta study up on Leachman Cattle Co.Chuckie":2x6ye58s said:Copeman, Leachman seems to have it going on in all departments. Looks like he has all the bells and whistles..
Fred Kloppenburg":dlg82d7l said:(Several hundred years of breeding has tossed out anything other than red). On that you can be sure. again rest my case